Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20250228094215.00001e7e@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:42:15 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <20250228094215.00001e7e@gmail.com> References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me> <vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me> <cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me> <lltpunF4fseU2@mid.individual.net> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com> <c4acndn4jJXKwCP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <gIUvP.1415795$21T3.138928@fx18.iad> <vpp6b0$31cet$2@dont-email.me> <5DWdnXyIYo7er136nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vppkbv$33b82$6@dont-email.me> <vpqm2d$39d65$1@dont-email.me> <-ducnbYn4JrmyFz6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <m2d8haFnv00U2@mid.individual.net> <4rOcnbWnvNi3L1z6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:42:19 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3dccc75d73b464398e0ad0110a29ef81"; logging-data="3956080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Jx7da/8vxTyjZ2QapT29RKMdhGS5xw+M=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:R7NtBcdPwYESIjBnuabqMvmwwr8= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2424 On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 07:55:08 -0500 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > The 'configurable' stuff ... sometimes you get a sort of next-level > idea that SOUNDS great, but by the time you really get into it then > it WOULD be just easier to write one-off reports or whatever. There's probably a corollary to Zawinski's Law about programs expanding to the point where every behavior is configurable (except the one thing you really *need* to configure...)