Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20250312201422.00007909@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:14:22 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <20250312201422.00007909@yahoo.com>
References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
	<20250304092827.708@kylheku.com>
	<vq7g1p$1vmg5$1@dont-email.me>
	<vq94dt$2boso$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqcsk7$23bfo$1@paganini.bofh.team>
	<vqefn1$3flpt$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqeu5c$3imil$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqeun4$3iqbq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqfcbe$3lkkc$1@dont-email.me>
	<871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com>
	<vqi1ge$8jg8$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqmgjv$3a2il$1@paganini.bofh.team>
	<vqn4dn$1eb9s$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqo3ss$3hkas$1@paganini.bofh.team>
	<vqph2e$203bs$2@dont-email.me>
	<vqpjh7$210q9$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqpo1s$222s0$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqpqo6$23197$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqpsvc$23gc1$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250311201757.000045e2@yahoo.com>
	<vqqaf0$267fp$2@dont-email.me>
	<20250312005843.00003584@yahoo.com>
	<vqqlc6$28fls$6@dont-email.me>
	<20250312105319.0000070b@yahoo.com>
	<vqs48v$2kqma$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250312163212.00005db3@yahoo.com>
	<vqse47$2mnr0$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:14:22 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4ef870278692d6db7d7d5b2c405359df";
	logging-data="2754990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LtMs9fj5Tv7svRXsQjrlZD3EDLejo6Fw="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Njs+MiyLRBWpmC/QCo2mn9GNTuk=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2574

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:52:24 +0000
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:

> 
> I don't know what the significance of UCRT-based means. As such that 
> would't make me stop using it.
> 


UCRT would give them pretty good compliance with requirements of C99,
C11 and C17 standards. Not perfect, but a lot better that circa-2014
libraries that they are using today.
Also, I suppose that it will give better compatibility with MS tools.
Personally for you, it likely means that GMP DLLs that I suggested
would work. And these DLLs are smaller, better tested and hopefully
compiled from newer sources than non-UCRT variant that you found.