| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20250312201422.00007909@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:14:22 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <20250312201422.00007909@yahoo.com> References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <vq7g1p$1vmg5$1@dont-email.me> <vq94dt$2boso$1@dont-email.me> <vqcsk7$23bfo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqefn1$3flpt$1@dont-email.me> <vqeu5c$3imil$1@dont-email.me> <vqeun4$3iqbq$1@dont-email.me> <vqfcbe$3lkkc$1@dont-email.me> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <vqi1ge$8jg8$1@dont-email.me> <vqmgjv$3a2il$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqn4dn$1eb9s$1@dont-email.me> <vqo3ss$3hkas$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqph2e$203bs$2@dont-email.me> <vqpjh7$210q9$1@dont-email.me> <vqpo1s$222s0$1@dont-email.me> <vqpqo6$23197$1@dont-email.me> <vqpsvc$23gc1$1@dont-email.me> <20250311201757.000045e2@yahoo.com> <vqqaf0$267fp$2@dont-email.me> <20250312005843.00003584@yahoo.com> <vqqlc6$28fls$6@dont-email.me> <20250312105319.0000070b@yahoo.com> <vqs48v$2kqma$1@dont-email.me> <20250312163212.00005db3@yahoo.com> <vqse47$2mnr0$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:14:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4ef870278692d6db7d7d5b2c405359df"; logging-data="2754990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LtMs9fj5Tv7svRXsQjrlZD3EDLejo6Fw=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Njs+MiyLRBWpmC/QCo2mn9GNTuk= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2574 On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:52:24 +0000 bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > > I don't know what the significance of UCRT-based means. As such that > would't make me stop using it. > UCRT would give them pretty good compliance with requirements of C99, C11 and C17 standards. Not perfect, but a lot better that circa-2014 libraries that they are using today. Also, I suppose that it will give better compatibility with MS tools. Personally for you, it likely means that GMP DLLs that I suggested would work. And these DLLs are smaller, better tested and hopefully compiled from newer sources than non-UCRT variant that you found.