Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20250324172236.000041fd@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:22:36 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <20250324172236.000041fd@yahoo.com>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me>
	<20250319115550.0000676f@yahoo.com>
	<vreuj1$1asii$4@dont-email.me>
	<vreve4$19klp$2@dont-email.me>
	<20250319201903.00005452@yahoo.com>
	<86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vrh1br$35029$2@dont-email.me>
	<LRUCP.2$541.0@fx47.iad>
	<vrh71t$3be42$1@dont-email.me>
	<874izntt5t.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrhviu$h5c$1@dont-email.me>
	<87ecyrs332.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vri9t1$a29t$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250320171505.221@kylheku.com>
	<vrif1v$c9ev$3@dont-email.me>
	<8734f7rw7z.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrjjvb$1esjh$1@dont-email.me>
	<87tt7mqk7w.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrkvt5$2k04q$2@dont-email.me>
	<87cye9afl0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrmckn$114k$1@dont-email.me>
	<871puoag2q.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrnoft$15f6n$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrh0c$qila$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrouo$11up7$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrqe0$12u8q$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrs20$14vob$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:22:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8fabfd30f2f67a3081bfca738499327b";
	logging-data="541663"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SH+3Eha5MfHTMURybQ3vyBFbOIv35vZA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ejQULblaoeGDf+rxOf1tS8JBE5M=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:00:17 -0000 (UTC)
Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:32:32 +0100
> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wibbled:
> >On 24/03/2025 15:07, bart wrote:  
> >> What was strange was that that one view was shared by pretty much 
> >> everyone in comp.lang.c.  
> >
> >Do you know what the people in comp.lang.c have in common?
> >
> >We program in C.
> >
> >Do you know /why/ people program in C?
> >
> >There can be many reasons, but a very common one is that they want
> >fast resulting binaries.  Most serious programmers are familiar with
> >more than one language, and pretty much all other languages are
> >higher level, easier, and have higher developer productivity than C
> >- but the resulting binaries are almost always slower.
> >
> >C programmers are typically not bothered about build times because
> >a) their build times are rarely high (Scott's projects are C++), and
> >b), they are willing to sacrifice high build times if it means more 
> >efficient run times.  
> 
> I'm not sure what kind of build time he's looking for either. On this
> Mac ARM laptop I can compile a 7600 line utility I wrote in C in 0.8
> seconds real time, and that is using a makefile with 18 seperate
> source files and a header and includes link time. So unless he's
> rebuilding the linux kernel every day I don't see what the problem is.
> 
> loki$ ls *.c *.h | wc -l
>       19
> loki$ wc -l *.c *.h
> :
> :
>      691 globals.h
>     7602 total
> loki$ time make
> :
> :
> real	0m0.815s
> user	0m0.516s
> sys	0m0.252s
> 
> 

You would illustrate you point better if you run 'time make -B'.