Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Code-change-to-run times (was Re: Suggested method for
 returning a string from a C program?)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:06:28 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <20250324230628.0000463a@yahoo.com>
References: <vrd77d$3nvtf$2@dont-email.me>
	<86r02roqdq.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vrh1br$35029$2@dont-email.me>
	<LRUCP.2$541.0@fx47.iad>
	<vrh71t$3be42$1@dont-email.me>
	<874izntt5t.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrhviu$h5c$1@dont-email.me>
	<87ecyrs332.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vri9t1$a29t$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250320171505.221@kylheku.com>
	<vrif1v$c9ev$3@dont-email.me>
	<8734f7rw7z.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrjjvb$1esjh$1@dont-email.me>
	<87tt7mqk7w.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrkvt5$2k04q$2@dont-email.me>
	<87cye9afl0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrmckn$114k$1@dont-email.me>
	<871puoag2q.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vrnoft$15f6n$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrh0c$qila$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrouo$11up7$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrqe0$12u8q$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrs20$14vob$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrrvnh$176lu$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrs0j5$191gt$1@dont-email.me>
	<vrs2eu$176lu$2@dont-email.me>
	<20250324095729.222@kylheku.com>
	<vrs5lu$1dj10$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 22:06:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="07163735a90f025f488641e369af9665";
	logging-data="1707088"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+L6KmRFPchkSn+6RrT1eXNkyVNBHbxswc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:evq40zOXEjFUw2T6GHJp1OAUeaM=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2938

On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:44:28 +0100
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 24.03.2025 18:15, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> > On 2025-03-24, bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:  
> >>
> >> When you have near-instant build times then it's completely
> >> different way of working.  
> 
> Obviously.
> 
> > [...]
> > 
> > [ Dart / Flutter ]
> > Turns out what that refers to is that they want update times
> > measured in **milliseconds*; that is, from the time a developer
> > makes a change, to that change being compiled, loaded in the live
> > application and running.  
> 
> If that "subcultures in contemporary development" is (or becomes)
> wide-spread or even standard... <shudder> - Software quality is
> often already bad enough, no reason to foster that evolution.
> 
> Janis
> 

Normally, fast turnaround improves the quality of software.
The worst case tends to be the one where devs stubbornly follow
original plan.