| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 16:13:23 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me>
<8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com>
<vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me>
<86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 15:13:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58f7fc265c99eb47e3d5fcc28f6142ae";
logging-data="684893"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1HtuSd3eAfi4tHPg2Rc9HAB+2UUmhrUM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IAgXgY4wZt7vYY3xwLiDXRxdqg8=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:47:47 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
> Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Em 4/4/2025 5:48 PM, Tim Rentsch escreveu:
> >
> >> Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> What do you think of this control block?
> >>>
> >>> do
> >>> {
> >>> FILE f = fopen("file.txt", "r");
> >>>
> >>> if (f == NULL) quit; /*goes to else part*/
> >>>
> >>> /*success here*/
> >>> for (int i =0; i < 10; i++){
> >>> ...
> >>> if (error) quit;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> }
> >>> else
> >>> {
> >>> /*some error*/
> >>> }
> >>
> >> I think it doesn't belong in comp.lang.c.
> >>
> >> I also think you have been participating in comp.lang.c
> >> long enough to know better. Kindly take your language
> >> fantasies somewhere else.
> >
> > I think the only reason you're saying that is because it's not
> > implemented in GCC, Clang, or maybe even MSVC.
>
> You are wrong. I responded because there is nothing in
> your posting that is suitable for comp.lang.c.
>
> > I've never seen you complain about any GCC extensions here.
>
> I don't remember seeing any posting in comp.lang.c that
> discusses a gcc extension and nothing else. There are
> plenty of postings that mention gcc extensions in passing,
> along with other material that talks about C, but never
> one that discusses gcc extensions exclusively.
>
> Furthermore, even if there had been a posting that concerns
> only a gcc extension and nothing else, and is one I didn't
> respond to, that doesn't excuse your action. It isn't like
> this is the first time you have posted something here that
> is not about C but only about your fantasy language, and
> also not the first time the unsuitability of such postings
> has been pointed out. You're a repeat offender. So stop
> pretending you are being picked on for no reason.
Could you recommend a more appropriate place for Thiago and others where
they can discuss C-like fantasy languages?