Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 19:03:21 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me>
	<8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me>
	<86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com>
	<86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 18:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58f7fc265c99eb47e3d5fcc28f6142ae";
	logging-data="684893"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oQaU+jFZMX9YMaJbhPWLTRxCmvtg2Lpc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1ay8GiVKyCvV31aCvAXCpO38epg=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)

On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 07:32:16 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:47:47 -0700
> > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
> >  
> >>
> >> Furthermore, even if there had been a posting that concerns
> >> only a gcc extension and nothing else, and is one I didn't
> >> respond to, that doesn't excuse your action.  It isn't like
> >> this is the first time you have posted something here that
> >> is not about C but only about your fantasy language, and
> >> also not the first time the unsuitability of such postings
> >> has been pointed out.  You're a repeat offender.  So stop
> >> pretending you are being picked on for no reason.  
> >
> > Could you recommend a more appropriate place for Thiago and others
> > where they can discuss C-like fantasy languages?  
> 
> The newsgroup comp.lang.misc seems like a natural candidate.
> I don't know if comp.lang.misc has an official charter, but at
> least to me new features of any widely used programming language
> would appear to fall under the umbrella of comp.lang.misc.

My question was not completely abstract.
I did consider starting a discussion about possibility of inclusion of
stackless co-routines into one of the future editions of C.
Naturally, my ideas at this state are extremely in-concrete, much more
so then the post of Thiago Adams that started this thread.
So, if I ever come to it, which by itself is not very likely, do you
think that comp.lang.misc would be better place than comp.lang.c ?