Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<20250411142636.00006c00@yahoo.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { }
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:26:36 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <20250411142636.00006c00@yahoo.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com>
	<vt15lq$bjs0$3@dont-email.me>
	<vt2lp6$1qtjd$1@dont-email.me>
	<vt31m5$2513i$1@dont-email.me>
	<vt3d4g$2djqe$1@dont-email.me>
	<vt3iqh$2ka99$1@dont-email.me>
	<868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vt3oeo$2oq3p$1@dont-email.me>
	<86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vt48go$35hh3$2@dont-email.me>
	<86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me>
	<86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com>
	<vt712u$1m84p$1@dont-email.me>
	<20250409170901.947@kylheku.com>
	<vt88bk$2rv8r$1@dont-email.me>
	<87wmbs45oa.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vt8hdp$333f0$1@dont-email.me>
	<87semf4pw5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vt9let$4au3$1@dont-email.me>
	<87zfgn344c.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:26:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1457423f50358e97c5843ab515ca741";
	logging-data="1467892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PwHUADMOvEYFLmnDb1Cx7FW5n7wi79VM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:59Z+RvKaqi2b3ClD9MO+Ejmta08=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2298

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:59:15 -0700
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> An understanding of what "compatible types" means. 

Bart didn't say that types are compatible or non-compatible.
He said that they are 'compatible enough'. That is not terminology of C
Standard, but terminology of his own. And he seems to understand it.

In my own translation, 'compatible enough' means that when these structs
are accessed then any sane or even semi-sane compiler will generate code
that will have the same effect as in case of access through structures
with literally identical declarations.