Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: VMS
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:44:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <20250625094418.00007fd2@gmail.com>
References: <wCqdnYde9MIbmND1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<87tt4i9nw5.fsf@eder.anydns.info>
	<102l0h9$fjtb$5@dont-email.me>
	<Z2udned3u9ZgqtP1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<slrn1054j9c.3ce8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
	<PpudnVnCnvuYxc_1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<wwva564xjps.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<4_GdncCsf-Nqe8n1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<wwv5xgqkfl9.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<103392c$lpbg$5@dont-email.me>
	<1033o4a$1qj6$3@dont-email.me>
	<1033tv1$3aqu$3@dont-email.me>
	<1034pj8$a74s$1@dont-email.me>
	<mbmm2nFdsgcU2@mid.individual.net>
	<slrn105cajs.4vj.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
	<slrn105g20l.3q8n7.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
	<slrn105k75h.h13.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
	<wwvpletmv3e.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<slrn105mpkd.q0k.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
	<KeednUgPwP3EDcb1nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com>
	<20250625093213.00002ec2@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d512b6635f3cd16b92286572adcaf1a4";
	logging-data="3031622"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193xIrBIeW2mmdKZdQqD0EDAQW7uk+QhUM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qtQW174pOZfwCidL9ZDUwr3Yo+Q=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32)

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:32:13 -0700
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Regardless, easy fix - always allocate at least one byte/word/
> > whatever more than you THINK you need. Minimal penalty - possibly
> > BIG gains.  
> 
> That strikes me as a terrible strategy - allocating N elements extra
> won't save you from overstepping into N+1 if and when you finally do

(Additionally, it won't save you from whatever weird undefined behavior
may result from reading an element N which isn't even part of the
"true" range and may have uninitialized/invalid data.)