Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 09:55:34 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2256f6071614a949d5a3c705827930d6a3f7e3a3@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org>
 <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me>
 <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org>
 <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <75921cc1f17cdb691969a99e666f237cd09c0b09@i2pn2.org>
 <vjsrp1$1tqvv$2@dont-email.me>
 <25729298b142c60d5b245231984119d42d4ac089@i2pn2.org>
 <vko14j$53b6$3@dont-email.me> <vko1vp$5mmo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vko2a3$5mmo$3@dont-email.me> <vkpkbr$fnhj$2@dont-email.me>
 <vkraki$tpqs$3@dont-email.me> <vkshm4$17741$1@dont-email.me>
 <vksjeq$17bf0$1@dont-email.me> <vktm9b$1hmvu$1@dont-email.me>
 <09ef32dfb3944d321e15e1383820166a2082d5cb@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv4p3$1qhgq$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d7fb8f4346eb09ea7ccdff45e8ff3d0c4a45ab0@i2pn2.org>
 <vl0e3v$25vs8$1@dont-email.me> <vl3khk$2qmdg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vl5um0$3au1p$2@dont-email.me>
 <85c0a8a2a0f1429c0b3c7acc69e659d174710347@i2pn2.org>
 <vl6ico$3ecap$3@dont-email.me>
 <e3793d1f63a114e37f5c8e1a410075362b18638b@i2pn2.org>
 <vl8879$3qtjc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 14:55:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1822925"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vl8879$3qtjc$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3013
Lines: 28

On 1/3/25 3:47 AM, WM wrote:
> On 02.01.2025 20:47, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 1/2/25 12:28 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Hint first try to understand 50 %, then 10 %, then 1 %, then 1 ppm, 
>>> then 1 ppb, then 1/10^10^10^10^10. And then go on. Then you 
>>> understand the properties of FISONs.
>>
>> And ALL finite fractional ratios of Aleph_0, are Aleph_0, and thus 
>> infinite so 
> 
> the set of FISONs covers less than any fractional ratio of ℕ. This is 
> true for their union too. Otherwise there must be a first FISON going 
> beyond this boundary.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

No, the set of *ALL* FISONs, is an infinite set, and covers *ALL* of the 
infinite set of N.

Your problem is you can't imagine what an infinite set actually is, 
because you logic is stuck in the land of finite operations, and thus 
you are trying to talk about things that don't exist in your logic system.

You are just showing how badly you system and brain have exploded into 
smithereens of inconsistancy from the error of using it outsides its 
abilities.