Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 03:08:34 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <23040d7430454f6ae57f4e0b1dd62f81@www.novabbs.com>
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com> <69a411f78f0258b39bc5cfad5d0a82a2@www.novabbs.com> <5eeed9d7dcd249453d28b665513d9ede@www.novabbs.com> <dfZOTD7gWFQtbW5-AX25hmrFeIQ@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2619859"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$.EbrxuCdaeb.gmZVZsmnL.ro3LXlMB4Yc8QAPWmshwSKjOfP8c2lu
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2571
Lines: 34

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 1:02:00 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 31/03/2025 à 23:54, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
> :
>> Relativity can be so easy to refute only because it has not been subject
>> to open critical review. It is facile nonsense.
>
> It's true.
>
> Scientific structures, like political structures, are strange and
> opaque.
>
> If someone tries to offer an interesting approach, or prove through
> calculations and reflection that there are biases and paradoxes, or even
> contradictions, they are blacklisted for decades.
>
> I think we'll have to wait until artificial intelligence is truly
> intelligent, and above all memorizing, for it to be able to say things
> for
> itself: "I detected in a participant a theory that far surpasses in
> quality, elegance, and experimental approach anything that has been said
> so far."
>
> For the moment, this hasn't happened because there is a huge human bias
> that consists of saying: "It is impossible for there to exist a human on
> earth capable of producing a theory superior to the one proposed by Mr.
> Einstein."
>
> Even if sometimes the denials turn into absurdity, even human madness.
>
> R.H.
The scientific consensus often involves the need to market their product
at the expense of the truth. The AI's are true believers. Albert in
reativityland does a good job of covering sociological and political
influences on the acceptance of relativity.