Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 01:27:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <233ba5ea053b6bb89dcc4861a797b025@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <4e36753b-0086-f154-ff9f-9569905d4d03@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <8a2fec3afd134f31003049fa8aa4d201@www.novabbs.com> <j9p3uk-1isg2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <e8c2adfd5adcc814df0a29c26f68f3d9@www.novabbs.com> <09n8uk-v4h6.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <d641367af84e80efbc3322286f2d7660@www.novabbs.com> <hn29uk-cap6.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <49bb9bb5d3ec5f2fb1964f5b414deb4d@www.novabbs.com> <tm8buk-0d29.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2671022"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$4IOqfiyolbNdoynj.M4i7.sFg2y2Jz4LI7GsHIvN159Cr/Bo0vddK
Bytes: 2694
Lines: 35

On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 23:48:15 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 3:53:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> You are incapable of comprehension, Penisnino.
>>>
>>> You said your device has 1000 times better efficiency while I pointed
>>> out that exiting devices have about 50% efficiency,
>>
>> Idiot you have no clue about engineering. There are many parameters
>> related to efficiency not just making up figures on the fly as you did.
>
> Irrelevant drivel. Efficiency can be trivially measured,

No it can't fool. You are making up figures on the fly with no basis
whatsoever. Typical.



but you don't
> understand how to measure anything nor apparently do you understand what
> the word efficiency means, crackpot.


You have no clue about anything, Penisnino. All you have is petulance
from your racism and bigotry. Funny that in its impotent way.
>
>> Arindam's design is certainly 1000 times at least better
>
> Delusional nonsense. As I have pointed out, the measured efficieny of
> such devices is about 50%. An efficiency of 50,000% is utter lunacy
> crackpot.
>
> <snip remaining delusional raving unread>