Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<25dae565c92bafbbaa0718910e4f1723@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 22:03:42 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <25dae565c92bafbbaa0718910e4f1723@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0dd990630edbc9332716605722eb087a@www.novabbs.com> <137de285af1075fd38879770e4639130@www.novabbs.com> <e3a7231ccaeda2a33dcba756f18dd831@www.novabbs.com> <vshdtq$3ojsg$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2730858"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$rTasvM1Nvypaf4TdnOA8VO5s8aKA7pFzpggrJzdUAjBs5DvgCbTUm
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939
Bytes: 3720
Lines: 57

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:18:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 30.03.2025 18:55, skrev rhertz:
>>
>> ENERGY IS NOT CONSERVED AT ALL. IT'S VALID ONLY ON EARTH AMONG A GROUP
>> OF SELF-ENTITLED INDIVIDUALS CALLED PHYSICISTS. THEY FIGHT FOR THE
>> INVIOLABLE DOGMA OF THE LCE, OTHERWISE THEY AND THEIR CAREER ARE FUCKED.
>>
>> AT THE BEGINNING OF XIX CENTURY, NATURAL PHILOSOPHERS (A.K.A.
>> PHYSICISTS) WERE GLAD TO INCLUDE HEAT IN THE OVERALL ACCOUNT OF ENERGY
>> WITHIN A CLOSED SYSTEM. THEY'VE RESTED ON THIS CONCEPT AND THE ONE OF
>> MOMENTUM CONSERVATION, SO THEIR EXCEL CALCULATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
>>
>> UNLESS THAT, IN ANOTHER MACRO-SCALE (LIKE THE UNIVERSE) THINGS ABOUT THE
>> AMOUNT OF MATTER THAT'S CALCULATED DISAGREE WITH THE FUCKING RELATIVITY.
>> THEN THEY CAME WITH THE CRAP OF DARK MATTER AND ENERGY FOR THE 95$
>> MISSING. SAME SHIT THAN WITH NEUTRINOS IN THE QUANTUM WORLD.
>>
>> THAT ENERGY CONSERVATION (AS WELL AS MOMENTUM CONSERVATION) ARE JUST
>> MYTHS, THERE IS THE THEORY OF THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE FROM A
>> PROVERBIAL ATOM THAT WENT OFF (FROM THE JESUIT PHYSICIST, 100 YEARS
>> AGO). EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE ROTATES, AND THERE ARE NOT ANY SINGLE
>> PROOF THAT THERE ARE EQUAL AMOUNTS OF ROTATIONS CLOCKWISE AND
>> COUNTERCLOCKWISE IN ALL THE CELESTIAL BODIES THAT JUSTIFY SUCH STUPID
>> IDEA (JUST BECAUSE LOCALLY IT SOUND NICE).
>>
>> SAME WITH MASS CONSERVATION LAW (STILL EXIST, ISN'T IT?). WHERE IS THE
>> SAME AMOUNT OF ANTI-MATTER TO COUNTERACT THE MATTER EXPELLED FROM THE
>> POINT THAT EXPLODED?
>>
>> PHYSICS IS A FUCKING FARCE, VALID ONLY FOR PARASITES (AND NOBEL
>> ENCOURAGED IT).
>>
>> THE WORLD DEVELOPED THANKS TO INVENTORS AND ENGINEER SINCE SUMERIAN
>> TIMES, OR MUCH OLDER THAN THAT.
>
> This is a HOAX, right?




- Angular momentum IS NOT CONSERVED on Earth. MAYBE, AND LOCALLY, in
outer space and up to Mars. After Mars, many things are unknown yet.
As an example, using an ice dancer, angular momentum changes when
rotating with arms extended or close to the body. Now compute losses due
to friction, air dragging and additional unknown quantum phenomena. NOT
CONSERVED.

- Linear momentum. Almost the same apply.

- Energy: Are planets REALLY verifying the LCE? They started to exist
from NOTHING and, millennia after millennia, some energy IS LOST! Why
does this happen and where the lost energy is going? Apply the same to
galaxies, local universe, etc.


There are HUGE DIFFERENCES between retarded idealist physicists and down
to Earth good engineers. But YOU ARE NEITHER, PAUL.