Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<26dd28b15c48cfd45d6deb857502b420db677aff.camel@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Real Number --- Merely numbers whose digits can be infinitely long Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 09:44:18 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <26dd28b15c48cfd45d6deb857502b420db677aff.camel@gmail.com> References: <c10c644441b2307e828f8392fb6993a78c580ee4.camel@gmail.com> <87edaobfm4.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0ad60eee1517af22b54bcdac3f4947895c9fa559.camel@gmail.com> <87o79p5h45.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0e898ea58ba39da3c6d3a2a4cbd9b198d4b5c37a.camel@gmail.com> <87ttjhkn6q.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <b903715ba20b5f40fb4bbcd1640e8ade97a233ac.camel@gmail.com> <87plu4lw6o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87le4slvuv.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <a2cf90b6ca7e1dd7dd2ed0da5e6710ea5f7adc20.camel@gmail.com> <87h6fgkke6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <658dff87eb1526d4ad914fbc8f6b882d89b9f289.camel@gmail.com> <87cyq3lnb5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 03:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="31e926adc28c127fb35dfe0dc276efe0"; logging-data="308148"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ngzp6TRLih4BC+uhN+2J0" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39) Cancel-Lock: sha1:o5tXbDAjjau/czNfVwEwoDsgv7c= In-Reply-To: <87cyq3lnb5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> Bytes: 2284 On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 18:02 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote: > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes: > [snip] > > Nothing is different from the math. you understand (except several corn= er cases > > which you will never need to worry about). >=20 > So there's nothing novel in your notation, and I needn't waste any more > time asking questions about it that you're unwilling and/or unable to > answer. >=20 > Is that a fair summary? >=20 > (I'll ignore the "corner cases" you allude to.) >=20 No, nothing novel there changed the usual usage of 'fixed point number'.