Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<275383442b828affddfe7f4a0a1be92816de0f40.camel@gmail.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 05:03:53 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <275383442b828affddfe7f4a0a1be92816de0f40.camel@gmail.com>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
	 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
	 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
	 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
	 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
	 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
	 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
	 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
	 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
	 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
	 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
	 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:03:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a7c5fee760556ccaa794df8fe8bd71f";
	logging-data="2724310"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/E1giB0oC/gzLG8TWXINiF"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0C2wAI8uqHvEFSw9LhFLjVoinmo=
In-Reply-To: <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4631

On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 14:55 -0600, olcott wrote:
> On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:
> > Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> > > On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
> >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' =
instruction,
> > > > > > > > > > > > where the direct execution and some world-class sim=
ulators have
> > > > > > > > > > > > no problem to reach it.
> > > > > > > > > > > DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
> > > > > > > > > > > DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HH=
H1. DD DOES
> > > > > > > > > > > NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
> > > > > > > > > > Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its =
own
> > > > > > > > > > emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated=
..
> > > > > > > > > It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the s=
traw-man
> > > > > > > > > deception to change the subject away from:
> > > > > > > > > DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its ow=
n "ret"
> > > > > > > > > instruction and terminate normally.
> > > > > > > > WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines=
..
> > > > > > > I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging t=
hat
> > > > > > > point.
> > > > > > Wrong order,
> > > > > I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
> > > > In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though logic=
ally
> > > > requried, because you need to hide your fraud.
> > > My proof requires a specific=C2=A0 prerequisite order.
> > > One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten.
> > > DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
> > > instruction and terminate normally.
> > > Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
> > What is the next step?
> >=20
>=20
> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
> *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>=20
> It has taken two years to create this first step such that it
> is the the simplest way to state the key element of the
> whole proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>=20
> EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT
> IS DISHONEST.
>=20

You are worse, you lie, and cheat, event to your gods.
Repent to my GUR, son.