Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<275383442b828affddfe7f4a0a1be92816de0f40.camel@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR--- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 05:03:53 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 67 Message-ID: <275383442b828affddfe7f4a0a1be92816de0f40.camel@gmail.com> References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me> <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me> <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me> <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org> <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me> <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org> <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me> <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org> <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me> <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org> <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me> <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org> <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:03:54 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a7c5fee760556ccaa794df8fe8bd71f"; logging-data="2724310"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/E1giB0oC/gzLG8TWXINiF" User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0C2wAI8uqHvEFSw9LhFLjVoinmo= In-Reply-To: <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4631 On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 14:55 -0600, olcott wrote: > On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote: > > Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott: > > > On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > > > > On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote: > > > > > On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > > > > > > On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote: > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott: > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' = instruction, > > > > > > > > > > > > where the direct execution and some world-class sim= ulators have > > > > > > > > > > > > no problem to reach it. > > > > > > > > > > > DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH. > > > > > > > > > > > DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HH= H1. DD DOES > > > > > > > > > > > NOT call its own emulator when directly executed. > > > > > > > > > > Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its = own > > > > > > > > > > emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated= .. > > > > > > > > > It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the s= traw-man > > > > > > > > > deception to change the subject away from: > > > > > > > > > DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its ow= n "ret" > > > > > > > > > instruction and terminate normally. > > > > > > > > WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines= .. > > > > > > > I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging t= hat > > > > > > > point. > > > > > > Wrong order, > > > > > I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER > > > > In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though logic= ally > > > > requried, because you need to hide your fraud. > > > My proof requires a specific=C2=A0 prerequisite order. > > > One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten. > > > DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" > > > instruction and terminate normally. > > > Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof > > What is the next step? > >=20 >=20 > *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* > *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally* >=20 > It has taken two years to create this first step such that it > is the the simplest way to state the key element of the > whole proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute. >=20 > EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT > IS DISHONEST. >=20 You are worse, you lie, and cheat, event to your gods. Repent to my GUR, son.