Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:20:56 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <28381a9633b0982dfd8a2e1f1ae183c8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp> <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com> <17eb7db913381cc9$330199$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmtVAt4HhKe0jdT-a3px1duKdmw@jntp> <v9i8c5$bvnu$9@dont-email.me> <VOohu46_lYfs6YEQG8qZQKYepNw@jntp> <v9ia7k$bvnu$11@dont-email.me> <FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp> <a610865812a2359182345fca40704d24@www.novabbs.com> <rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp> <ca24c2f588c95528f26e6aafe368ee31@www.novabbs.com> <17ebabcfbfa36128$252843$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2582243"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$GQyy5OIVIsdmBhqjTn1gpOCyaSL69ObKdx9PxkQad4HQPE8rZwXOG
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3768
Lines: 72

On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:29:51 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 14.08.2024 o 20:11, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:37:09 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
> > >
> > > Le 14/08/2024 à 16:39, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Actually, time passes MORE quickly at the satellite. 
> "Chronotropy" is
> > > > a canard.  The rate of the satellite clock is set to run slow so
> that
> > > > it is observed to run at the proper rate on the earth.  The reason
> why
> > > > the satellite must be updated is because (1) the satellite is not
> in
> > > > an exactly circular orbit and (2) the earth does not have a
> uniform
> > > > density.
> > > >
> > > > Someone (I'm not naming any names) needs to do some studying.
> > >
> > > This is a very interesting post.
> > > It asks a question: "How is it that the satellite, which apparently
> goes
> > > faster than the earth, has a time that passes faster, contrary to
> what
> > > SR predicts?"
> >
> > Because, of course, it's GR.
> >
> > > We answer it as we can, today, the answer is that it seems that
> > > apparently, gravitation slows down time.
>
> > It's not just "apparent": it's confirmed by experiment.
>
> Bullshit,

Yes, that describes what Wozniak does very well.

> anyone can check - time (as defined by your idiot guru himself)

Ah, Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and
insults.

> is galilean, with the precision of an acceptable error.

Refuted by copious experimental evidence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_testing_3

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/einsteins-time-dilation-prediction-verified/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_testing_of_time_dilation#Experiments

Only liars or fools protest this factual evidence.

> Your bunch of idiots

Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and insults.

> is trying to lie that the indications of clocks ere not equal,

No one is saying the indications aren't equal.  Wozniak is wrong about
that.

> but asking you what they are then - results
> only in insults and slanders. Lies have
> short legs, poor trash.

No insults, slanders or lies on this side of the table.  Wozniak is
projecting
again.  His posts have the shortest legs of all.