Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<283hvihc9t1g79ftila5bgl9ah0avq4hrk@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: This FOSS Thang :-) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:51:28 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <283hvihc9t1g79ftila5bgl9ah0avq4hrk@4ax.com> References: <uso2en$184pn$1@solani.org> <uson6b$41s8$1@dont-email.me> <usrduc$19trd$8@solani.org> <17bc507b67b57d08$991$3331982$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <ust72a$15o5t$2@dont-email.me> <ut0c1k$1v14t$1@dont-email.me> <r0d7vihrm8h6jj2f16ga2bkekj8teff5gf@4ax.com> <tdd7vi13j85lppsbshh0ub9osl5s9fodgf@4ax.com> <ut2dcf$1djco$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="311577238e1656d8d3a16ca723b24387"; logging-data="352884"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9SGECeElwCFPmiyb+IY5jpfogc+EXfuY=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0kf2HK9JAkaP//6dQbbXW9axW8o= OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2086 Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think if you want a secure system you have let them have some >>> control of it. It's a good reason to use Linux, avoiding the pitfalls >>> of Winblows. >> >> have to* let them [M$] have some control of it > >That's not in my nature. Never voluntarily. Certainly, Linux gives one a way to avoid it. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.