| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<28809586532a39a78550d734ce59b143ee8d28a9@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 14:00:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: The proof of Noether theorem Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <183c8f1d7e4023e0$3256502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 18 Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 12:00:06 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1135 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <183c9fc0f291a830$888192$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 1552 On 5/5/2025 1:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 05/04/2025 11:55 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: >> Well, Pythagorean theorem had about >> 120 proofs - and is still [allegedly] >> not valid for the world we inhabit. >> >> So, how about Noether theorem? Proven >> or not, the question whether it is valid >> should still be open I guess? > > It's really simple and follows from Pauli principle. I bet it is; but is it valid for the reality, like 2+2=4 or not, like Pythagorean theorem?