Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<28809586532a39a78550d734ce59b143ee8d28a9@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 14:00:06 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The proof of Noether theorem
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <183c8f1d7e4023e0$3256502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 18
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 12:00:06 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1135
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <183c9fc0f291a830$888192$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1552

On 5/5/2025 1:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 05/04/2025 11:55 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>> Well, Pythagorean theorem had about
>> 120 proofs - and is still [allegedly]
>> not valid  for the world we inhabit.
>>
>> So, how about Noether theorem? Proven
>> or not, the question whether it is valid
>> should still be open I guess?
> 
> It's really simple and follows from Pauli principle.

I bet it is; but is it valid for the
reality, like 2+2=4 or not, like
Pythagorean theorem?