Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp>
 <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp>
 <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com> <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp>
 <6f498e8663ec0b05b9cd9e03df9b4de4@www.novabbs.com> <tWsKauuW6XViPa1OVHe8GAFt0pY@jntp>
 <0cb92f486425b83cdc71dbdea3093427@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: dmtI26x4OZcqlZ3yu_ompZS05tc
JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 24 12:18:23 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-16T12:18:23Z/8950765"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3470
Lines: 31

Le 16/07/2024 à 01:21, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:30:10 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

Thank you for your response, to which I would add two clarifications:
During the Gran Sasso group experiment and the fantastic revelations of 
supramumin neutrinos, I immediately warned that the examiners must have 
been wrong. Proof that I hold my theoretical positions very firmly, where 
others were ready to abandon one of the essential pillars of the SR.
I repeat: “There will therefore be an OBSERVABLE speed limit which will 
extend to all particles and all the laws of physics”.
In a thousand years, or in a hundred thousand years, we will still say the 
same thing, like we will say that it is impossible to find a natural 
number between five and six.
Secondly, I would like to come back to the supernovae of 1987, which posed 
a small problem of understanding, and it was said: "The neutrinos arrived 
six hours before the photons, and therefore they were faster than the 
light."
Another proposition was made, in my opinion completely false, "it is 
because the neutrinos left the heart of the star, and the light took 
longer to leave the surface".
I think a third explanation could be valid, and since I like to play, I 
won't tell you, but I'll give you some biscuits.
What if it was the neutrinos that moved at the speed of light and not the 
light?
What if, sometimes, like in air, the speed of light was slowed down in 
space? Are there not, in the immense space existing between the earth and 
the supernovae, a few gas molecules capable of slowing down light, while 
neutrinos have an instantaneous transfer, that is to say an observable 
speed? What does the light not have in this case?
Do you understand my argument?

R.H.