| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2a175cca67cb1122f8ad19b2483dc539@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mpsilvertone@yahoo.com (HarryLime) Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems Subject: Re: My Father's House / gjd (for new comments) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:46:12 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <2a175cca67cb1122f8ad19b2483dc539@www.novabbs.com> References: <FySdnXN-1qVsLSH6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <ANydne5k8LnDJyH6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <9696ab64fdaa79fb8780f6fe74e00360@www.novabbs.com> <05b72de9af26421146708816875bc309@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1608699"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="9yNNWN6S3jCL2bQghupeZ7yt9QQF3aIiWb2guQimaIw"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: e04a750cbe04de725ce24a46bcc3953c76236e3b X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$tsRQUlzgjhOKzc757.zJ7ey0L4rBZTjxkCQ69PzNcic/eM8oNw/vW X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:31:03 +0000, W.Dockery wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:16:33 +0000, HarryLime wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:24:25 +0000, Will-Dockery wrote: >> >>> HarryLime wrote: >>>> Will Dockery wrote: >>>>> HarryLime wrote: >>>>> Will Dockery wrote: >>>>> George J. Dance wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My Father's House >>>>> >>>>> This is my father's house, although >>>>> The man died thirteen years ago. >>>>> They said it would be quite all right >>>>> To take a drive to see it now. >>>>> >>>>> Dad laid those grey foundation blocks >>>>> And built the whole thing (from a box), >>>>> Toiling after each full day's work. >>>>> I helped, though I was only six. >>>>> >>>>> Look, here's the back door I would use >>>>> And here's where I'd remove my shoes >>>>> To enter; there I'd leave my things >>>>> And, when allowed, climb up these stairs. >>>>> >>>>> In this room I'd wash many a dish, >>>>> Gaze out this window, and I'd wish >>>>> To be so many other places. >>>>> (Wishy-washy? Oh, I guess!) >>>>> >>>>> Outside, the garden that he grew >>>>> Where I would work the summers through, >>>>> While watching my friends run and play >>>>> Mysterious games I never knew. >>>>> >>>>> That room's all changed; oh, where is it, >>>>> The one chair I was let to sit? >>>>> (For boys can be such filthy things.) >>>>> Which, the corner where boys were put? >>>>> >>>>> Oh ... down that hall there is a room >>>>> Where I'd be shut (as in a tomb) >>>>> After the meal, to make no noise, >>>>> To read or play alone, and then >>>>> >>>>> Lights out: in bed by nine each night, >>>>> Some nights wanting to pee with fright, >>>>> Face and pyjama bottoms down >>>>> As for my father's belt I'd wait. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, if I were a millionaire >>>>> I'd buy my father's house, and there >>>>> I'd build a bonfire, oh so high >>>>> Its flames would light up all the air. >>>>> >>>>> ~~ >>>>> George J. Dance >>>>> from Logos and other logoi, 2021 >>>>> >>>>> Here it is, MFH. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for reposting this poem of mine, Will. While it's true that it >>>>> has been discussed a lot over the years, it also true that at least one >>>>> person wants to discuss it now; and this would be the appropriate place >>>>> to move those comments, rather than leaving them scattered all over the >>>>> group. So let's start with this one: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:15:27 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MPP) aka >>>>> "HarryLime" wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 13:06:00 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: >>>>> Why do you lie so much, George? >>>>> (That's a rhetorical question, as you've already intimated that your >>>>> pathological lying stems from you having been abused as a child.) >>>>> >>>>> No, Lying Michael: I have never said, or even "intimated" (!) >>> that I was >>>>> pathological, lying, or >>>>> "abused as a child". >>>>> >>>>> You wrote a "mostly autobiographical" poem detailing the abuses >>> you >>>>> suffered as a child, George. And you're demonstrating your pathological >>>>> obsession with lying in your trio of denials, listed above. >>>>> https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article.php?id=15801&group=rec.arts.poems >>>>> >>>>> HarryLiar has manufactured yet another fake quote; I have never called >>>>> this poem "mostly autobiographical" or autobiographical in many >>> ways. I >>>>> have distinctly told him in the past that, while some of the speaker's >>>>> memories were based on my own childhood experiences, not all of them >>>>> were; I was using them in a work of creative fiction, not an >>>>> autobiography of any kind. So he lied and made up a fake quote to >>>>> support his lie. >>>>> >>>>> The poem is meant to be a dramatic monolgue, in the style of Browning >>>>> (His "My Last Duchess" is a good example), meant to get inside >>> the >>>>> psychology of a speaker or persona. The speaker may have experienced >>>>> his childhood as "abuse" - HarryLiar calls it that but the >>> speaker >>>>> doesn't. The memories of it, though, have stayed on his mind, and he >>>>> wants to get rid of those memories (symbolized by burning down the house >>>>> at the end). >>>>> >>>>> It's deliberately left to the reader to decide if the speaker actually >>>>> had been abused by his father or not. I did structure it, for effect, >>>>> from the least to the most abusive-seeming experiences; from having to >>>>> use a back door and remove his shoes to enter the house, to doing >>>>> household chores, to doing garden work in the summertime, to not being >>>>> allowed to use some of the furniture, to having to stay inside alone at >>>>> night and be in bed early, to being subjected to corporal punishment. >>>>> Adding them together like that, it's easy enough to conclude that the >>>>> father had been abusive; but I'll point out that all of those events >>>>> were things children commonly experienced 50-60 years ago, and that none >>>>> of them were commonly considered abusive. >>>>> >>>>> As Karla Rogers often reminded us: >>>>> >>>>> "Try not to mistake the speaker in the poem with the writer of the >>>>> poem." >>>>> >>>>> As I'd noted in my post, Karla's oft-quoted adage (oft-quoted by you, >>>>> that is), is simply incorrect. >>>>> >>>>> My previous post explains why: >>>>> >>>>> "In fact, Karla's oft-quoted adage aside, one can *never* fully >>> separate >>>>> the two. >>>>> For instance, all of the characters in any author's fictional novel are >>>>> going to represent some aspect of the author. Every poem stems from its >>>>> author's imagination... regardless of what external persons and/or >>>>> events might have inspired it. Every literary work is similar to a >>>>> dream construct in that regard; and like a dream construct, can be >>>>> analyzed by a psychologist, a literary critic, or even the average >>>>> reader. Since "My Father's House" was based to a large extent on >>> your >>>>> own childhood experiences, it literally begs for a psychoanalytical >>>>> reading." >>>>> >>>>> You dispute the wisdom of the mighty Karla Rogers? >>>>> >>>>> I'm here for the poetry. >>>>> >>>>> You're only here to lie and misrepresent, Harry. >>>>> >>>>> While I've been discussing the poetry of Robert Creeley for a >>>>> week now. >>>>> >>>>> You've made very few attempts to discuss anyone's poetry over the years >>>>> >>>>> No, I've discussed dozens of poems and poets here over more than two >>>>> decades. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I challenged you to pick a Bukowski >>>>> poem of you choice, and write at least one paragraph >>>>> >>>>> I posted that months ago, Harry. >>>>> >>>>> Look it up. >>>>> >>>>> 1) I'm not going to search though 1,000s of Usenet threads >>>>> >>>>> I've bumped it to the top for you several times, Pendragon. >>>>> >>>>> Apparently you didn't want to see it because it proves you wrong and we >>>>> all know you're not good with being proven wrong. >>>> >>>> I don't open 99% of your >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> >>> Well, that thread you should open rather than whining endlessly about >>> it. >>> ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========