Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:37:57 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2b9b53e39227b6afbc9a649b711aa3c83339f5a4@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vqbk27$2stvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqcvdj$34c3r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:37:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3193786"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vqcvdj$34c3r$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3556
Lines: 51

On 3/6/25 3:09 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/6/2025 1:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-03-04 14:17:56 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>>> int DD() { int Halt_Status = HHH(DD); if (Halt_Status) HERE:
>>>>> goto HERE; return Halt_Status; }
>>>>>
>>>>> _DD() [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping [00002134] 
>>>>> 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping [00002136]
>>>>> 51         push ecx      ; make space for local [00002137]
>>>>> 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD [0000213c] e882f4ffff call
>>>>> 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04 
>>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax [00002147] 837dfc00
>>>>> cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f [0000214d] 
>>>>> ebfe       jmp 0000214d [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov
>>>>> eax,[ebp-04] [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp [00002154]
>>>>> 5d         pop ebp [00002155] c3         ret Size in bytes:
>>>>> (0035) [00002155]
>>>>>
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own
>>>>> "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>> I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the
>>>> 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution or world-class
>>>> simulators have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of
>>>> exactly the same finite string as input.
>>>
>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of exactly how
>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>
>> Not true. A sufficient rebuttal is anything that makes a reader to
>> notice that you have not proven one (or more) of your claims.
>>
> 
> A specific rebuttal of this specific claim
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own
>>>>> "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
> Requires a specific rebuttal of that claim
> 
> 

Since your "claim" is just based on an admitted FRAUD, just pointing out 
the FRAUD is a sufficient rebuttal.

Face it, you sunk your reputation by building you life's work on LIES 
and FRAUD, because you weren't smart enough to try to do it right and 
work on your own "new" system based on your ideas.

Sorry, but it seems you just don't have the brain cells to handle that 
task, and your inability to follow rules makes it hard to properly 
define the rules you system will use.