Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <2c3oajpcbclg3qgkphupe3i5qf8j5vjl5s@4ax.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<2c3oajpcbclg3qgkphupe3i5qf8j5vjl5s@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: OT: Mini Rant About New Car
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:41:04 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <2c3oajpcbclg3qgkphupe3i5qf8j5vjl5s@4ax.com>
References: <v8fstu$24v4j$1@dont-email.me> <m53najt6e3o6rk2pjdtu2vf0c4hbju0fg4@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="81b7848bfcc9ff7f1fae61fefaab9551";
	logging-data="2557066"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yQZnb1NNTv9492k5mdCJh"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4QULu9/RTUzXR2/K2zVrxdn+16A=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
Bytes: 4839

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:

>On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:52:29 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Well our old one is finally on its last legs with what is probably a 
>>dodgy alternator but they aren't quite sure and it's not really worth 
>>possibly fixing it due to the age of the car vs. the cost. Kinda 
>>annoying as although it's almost twenty years old it only has 50,000 
>>miles on the clock. Enter stage left the used but only a year and a half 
>>old one.
>>
>>Feck me it's like sitting behind a computer with all the controls and 
>>displays it has. The navigation, entertainment and communications 
>>owner's manual is eighty pages long. Do the really think I'm going to 
>>read all of that. The amusing part is that the standard owner's manual 
>>spends four pages explaining how to put petrol in it. So someone is 
>>going to understand all the complications of the location services but 
>>doesn't know what that round flap is for.
>>
>>On the plus side it does have some niceties such as displaying the 
>>actual speed limit in case you've missed the sign, not having to take 
>>the key out of your pocket to start it and the top of my list - user 
>>profiles so you can have the wing mirrors and AC adjusted to how you 
>>like them. Now if only we could get a toilet seat that does the same.
>>
>>The less said about warning me that my small rucksack in the passenger 
>>seat isn't wearing a seat belt the better. Oh and there's an app because 
>>of course there is.
>
>Modern cars annoy me with their reliance on flat-panel displays to
>control almost everything. I get why this is; not only does it look
>'flashy' and 'clean', but it's also a lot cheaper to just use a single
>touch-screen display rather than the dozens of buttons we used to
>have. It's also easier to embed a lot of extra functions without
>needing to rework the dashboard for the new controls.

and of course it's impossible to not drive distracted to change fucking
anything with this system instead of the old buttons an knobs on
everything.

Want Ac, delve in menus, want heat, delve in menus, want to change radio
station , delve in menus.


Literally _designed_ to distract the driver, along with the "oh look
we're scrolling the band and song name on the front of the fucking
radio" bullshit.

>But it's just so damned inconvenient to use. Everything always seems
>to be hidden two or three menus deep, making for slow and cumbersome
>navigation. And forget doing it while you're driving; you can't afford
>to take your eyes off the road that long! Old-fashioned cars, you'd
>just memorize where the button to turn on the radio or the defroster
>and muscle memory would take it from there, but with touch-screen
>displays you need stare at the stupid screen. It's aggravating and
>dangerous.

Indeed, everything at your fingertips, but that's not longer, sleek,
svelte and modern, so hey, just drive into the back of a dump truck
trying to turn the fucking heat up while not parked.

>There is, slowly but finally, some pushback to this design philosophy,
>with some cars coming with more dedicated buttons. But it's not
>enough.
>
>And don't even get me started on the embedded tracking and
>data-collection used by car-manufacturers (and insurance companies,
>and law enforcement) to spy on drivers. It's positively dystopian.

this has recently been touted as a feature to save you money, if you
know, you are the perfect driver according to the insurance companies,
and are never surprised by, oh I dunno, a kid chasing a ball between
parked cars for which you calm on the brakes to avoid killing them
(flagged as, heavy breaking, inattentive driver, increase premium.)

Xocyll