Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<2caf369163b221eb6bb5b689c12c45ea@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: melahi_ahmed@yahoo.fr (ahmed)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:14:27 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <2caf369163b221eb6bb5b689c12c45ea@www.novabbs.com>
References: <nnd$2fb29a8e$298ef3f8@23fe4f00fa62d734> <9c16141dfe3c785e316678770e965566@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$1e8bdda8$517f1da6@703473522193e69c> <5170b8c9503530e924a5dc3619557093@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$7db3960e$6f210bf2@af859e2089776062>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2045763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="t+/9LUKLIiUqIe6reyFE7me/EcA/Gr17dRXgwnADesE";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 5f6b2e70af503e44dad56966aa15d35bdef29623
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$njAScKUNMPB0mswuO/pX/esPjFqHeOqAIhwgAfQ3dza9dA0Z3sE2G
Bytes: 2383
Lines: 37

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:43:11 +0000, Hans Bezemer wrote:

> On 31-01-2025 16:16, ahmed wrote:
>> I didn't do this comparison for anything but just to test the
>> possibility to integrate it (use it) in my forth programs which need
>> speed (fuzzy logic, neural networks).
>> I'm not arguing anything about forth or 4th, I'm just a user.
>
> "But what about the speed of execution?"
> Well, you wanted an explanation - and you got one: primitives will
> always win from fancy, high level implementations. That's why you have
> to test your specific implementation if the documentation isn't clear on
> how certain features are implemented.

Thanks, for this explanation.

...

>  From a user perspective, the story is very simple - pick the one that
> fits you. Who am I to argue with what you need? I don't know you and I
> don't know the task you want to fulfill.

That's what I'm doing.

> If I have any beef it's why do you need a 50 line (high level) reference
> implementation if you can implement the same functionality with one
> single cleverly designed line (which is much more Forth like).

Yes, you are right.

> And yeah - don't use locals at all. Bad habit. Gee - coming from me,
> that's a big surprise.
>
> Hans Bezemer

Ahmed

--