Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: portable malloc
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:52:59 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <2cd5dcbd44d71a2b76021f7b44034143@www.novabbs.org>
References: <2024Oct6.150415@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <memo.20241006163428.19028W@jgd.cix.co.uk> <2024Oct7.093314@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <7c8e5c75ce0f1e7c95ec3ae4bdbc9249@www.novabbs.org> <2024Oct8.092821@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <ve5ek3$2jamt$1@dont-email.me> <be506ccef76d682d13205c69c761a086@www.novabbs.org> <ve6oiq$2pag3$1@dont-email.me> <ve6tv7$2q6d5$1@dont-email.me> <86y12uy8ku.fsf@linuxsc.com> <jwv34kx5afd.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <venpin$241bk$2@dont-email.me> <veu2uv$3cluq$1@dont-email.me> <veudt1$3ep62$1@dont-email.me> <vf3qgi$ijah$1@dont-email.me> <vf6ndm$14l9a$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3101088"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="o5SwNDfMfYu6Mv4wwLiW6e/jbA93UAdzFodw5PEa6eU";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$J2CKwekCH/Smt/IQwQnXAu/3Jv8UZxh/zpCUMNjj.0ulyn4FcDz5.
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cb29269328a20fe5719ed6a1c397e21f651bda71
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1850
Lines: 10

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:17:10 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:51:30 +0100, Vir Campestris wrote:
>
>> Because some implementations will require
>> communication with the OS there cannot be a truly portable malloc.
>
> There can if you have a portable OS API. The only serious candidate for
> that is POSIX.

POSIX is an environment not an OS.