| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2d0f15f4d3184c7c1233b48e6b227097@dizum.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: D <J@M> References: <20250320204547.0000274b@dne3.net> <874izak212.fsf@gmail.com> <vshbnj$3nh1s$1@dont-email.me> <x87plhsax2t.fsf@somewhere.edu> <20250404192145.00006d0f@dne3.net> Subject: Re: ad-hoc wifi news transport Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <2d0f15f4d3184c7c1233b48e6b227097@dizum.com> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 03:03:26 +0200 (CEST) Newsgroups: news.software.nntp Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128 Bytes: 2218 Lines: 29 On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 19:21:45 -0400, Toaster <toaster@dne3.net> wrote: >On Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:13:46 -0300 >Ethan Carter <ec1828@somewhere.edu> wrote: >> bp@www.zefox.net writes: >> > Ethan Carter <ec1828@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Toaster <toaster@dne3.net> writes: snips > >My original idea was to leverage wifi's characteristics to propagate >articles in a flooding manner. It bypasses all of the complexity of >ad-hoc wifi peering and uses all of the strengths of a radio based >broadcast medium. It'd be anonymous and virtually uncensorable. (and >free transport with no configuration or centralized anything) >Using the internet, I'd just use NNTP. UUCP would work for serial links >or the like, but NNTP already exists, so why not use it? >But don't stop there, imo NNTPchan should have leveraged the existing >usenet network instead of having another separate network of >incompatible servers. Just make a top level hierarchy and use that for >the service data, or under alt, who cares. >I think the problem is going to be getting people to use it, as it >stands alot of people like having control over their own little >communities. Bad news is good data can just disappear forever. So many >lost geocities pages full of content gone. :( some of those geocities sites (sans ftp-linked content) may still be available on archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/*/geocities.com >https://web.archive.org/web/19961022173245/http://www.geocities.com/ many old web sites can still be at least partially accessed this way