| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2d183ff5e0d79c018255c30e04553e80@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The purpose of science Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:12:17 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <2d183ff5e0d79c018255c30e04553e80@www.novabbs.com> References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <503bf530af58f5cc1d906cd72cdfcc83@www.novabbs.com> <17debcc079d5ab22$1$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <10d5b1d29f6ed1ed9be13f1f9c348ae5@www.novabbs.com> <17dec532cd90938d$1$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <b122095cc1706bae6c1c11c48f294fdb@www.novabbs.com> <17deccd3b0ec78ee$2$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2067861"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$otlgcq6JvdRG0wTsAYdbbez7EntzLn5CVOWzjx74C9ckd884cPswi X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2629 Lines: 44 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 03.07.2024 o 20:20, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > W dniu 03.07.2024 o 19:21, gharnagel pisze: > > > > > >> > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > See, Harrie - I'm a professional in the > > > > > field, > > > > > > > > The "field"? Information? No, Woz, the field you're > > > > trying to define is science, not information. > > > > > > I'm not trying to define either science, > > > or any field. > > > > Not so, Woz. > > Yes so, Har. You're not being honest, Woz. Just "'cause I said so" is not a valid answer. I gave you a valid answer why you were indeed trying to define science and you left it out of your non-reply, so here it is again: "You wrote "Science is setting [truth], "not discovering it" I wrote that your claim is equivalent to "Science = setting truth." When I say A = B, I'm defining A to be the same as B. You can twist and turn all you want, but https://www.dictionary.com/browse/definition Definition: "the act of defining, or of making something definite, distinct, or clear" Which is EXACTLY what you were doing. “The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.” -- Winston Churchill So please stop the childish nonsense and act like a responsible adult.