| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2d5c43eedeb81d8b0382bb6bd8dce1f5@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:23:51 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-Id: <2d5c43eedeb81d8b0382bb6bd8dce1f5@www.novabbs.com> References: <00939c17919600807e3ad6527b47e74d@www.novabbs.com> <8e4d47b49b0d08a32c4d241a7bd9f85c@www.novabbs.com> <3d134676dad974fcfee511fe7270d781@www.novabbs.com> <67908532.7C80@ix.netcom.com> <19ddbd5db442cdc46b7a062e33fe27db@www.novabbs.com> <vmqtu2$11dr3$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="620156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$GXifMk9dLIGjUd5qAYe/C.3wXsMh84bBYYsUdwOzuKS9eII37Y.jW On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:07:23 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 22.01.2025 07:09, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: >> Thank you, but the refraction of sunlight that keeps the Sun visible >> after astronomical sunset and the bending of starlight during an eclipse >> are not perspectival or illusions. > > Have you still not learned the difference between > refraction and gravitational deflection, Laurence? > > Do you remember that you made fool of yourself when > you claimed that Poor said that Einstein's equation > was "a refraction formula"? > What Poor said was: > "The mathematical formula, by which Einstein calculated his > deflection of 1.75 seconds for light rays passing the edge > of the sun, is a well known and simple formula of physical optics" > > The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is a gravitational deflection formula, > but since you think it is "a refraction formula" you can > try to use it to explain why the Sun is seen above the horizon > when it really is below it. Good luck! :-D For the experiments to prove the doubling, they would have to prove that space curves and parallel lines meet. They do not and cannot. They have proven nothing.