Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:11:18 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <2d99fda02a914a2ca5fc193395f159b4c924a6b4@i2pn2.org>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me> <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me> <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me> <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me> <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me>
 <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me> <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me>
 <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me> <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me> <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me>
 <v95cke$p5rb$5@dont-email.me> <v977fo$gsru$1@dont-email.me>
 <v97goj$ielu$1@dont-email.me> <v9c93e$35sg6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9d3k1$3ajip$1@dont-email.me> <v9ffpr$3s45o$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9fkd4$3se8c$1@dont-email.me> <v9kg66$tdvb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9nbjf$1dj8q$1@dont-email.me>
 <20b1dea98eda49e74e822c96b37565bb3eb36013@i2pn2.org>
 <v9o4p2$1h5u4$1@dont-email.me> <v9shii$2bmob$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9sog0$2c67u$8@dont-email.me> <v9uu18$2pt1d$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9veka$2rjt1$8@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 02:11:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3166591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v9veka$2rjt1$8@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3659
Lines: 43

On 8/19/24 8:42 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 8/19/2024 2:59 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-18 12:12:48 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 8/18/2024 5:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-08-16 18:11:46 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/16/2024 11:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/24 7:02 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *This abolishes the notion of undecidability*
>>>>>>> As with all math and logic we have expressions of language
>>>>>>> that are true on the basis of their meaning expressed
>>>>>>> in this same language. Unless expression x has a connection
>>>>>>> (through a sequence of true preserving operations) in system
>>>>>>> F to its semantic meanings expressed in language L of F
>>>>>>> x is simply untrue in F.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you clearly don't understand the meaning of "undecidability"
>>>>>
>>>>> Not at all. I am doing the same sort thing that ZFC
>>>>> did to conquer Russell's Paradox.
>>>>
>>>> Zermelo constructed a new formal theory that does not have that 
>>>> paradox.
>>>> Note that the paradox was not present in Cantor's original theory as
>>>> Cantor did not promise that Russell's set exists. But Cantor's original
>>>> presentation was not fully formal so it was not clear that Russell's
>>>> set does not exist.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am redefining the notion of a formal system to get
>>> rid of undecidability. This requires few changes.
>>
>> Put a draft and a request for discussion on a web site.
>>
> 
> I post here to establish my priority date for intellectual
> property purposes. Websites can go out-of-business.
> 

Then work out some real details and start posting about the foundation 
you are building, and stop trying to insert it into an existing system 
where it doesn't fit.