| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2e_cMrX34JahkNQqRDxqIFNvhgo@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <2e_cMrX34JahkNQqRDxqIFNvhgo@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <vb1mk4$1g551$1@dont-email.me> <siZVeXFhx1b-RHNvgyKaFJEz2Sc@jntp> <vb28vm$1i5d6$2@dont-email.me> <2VJMHmUL3oTjzHTxkbHeeVgwp1A@jntp> <vb2tvf$1ls0b$1@dont-email.me> <QvtSmsnuKuh4troKUDwPfuVfMeM@jntp> <vb5g98$316r1$1@dont-email.me> <Q8KEctOaUBqooKPOP_92YyimTgc@jntp> <vb6kn3$39eu2$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: AiVkoc_-rTTeXsVlsw37KlKQ23k JNTP-ThreadID: 76aXiNOmFXLuhuEL0ulE9Z2aOsc JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=2e_cMrX34JahkNQqRDxqIFNvhgo@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 03 Sep 24 09:28:15 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-03T09:28:15Z/9009272"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 3056 Lines: 38 Le 03/09/2024 à 11:25, Python a écrit : > Le 03/09/2024 à 11:07, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >> Le 03/09/2024 à 01:04, Python a écrit : >>> >>> Sorry Richard, but the notation tX(eN) is, according to yourself, >>> supposed to mean "time for clock X of event eN" (which is out of the >>> scope of a synchronization procedure if the event eN took place >>> far from clock X anyway). >>> >>> So when you write tA'(e2) your referencing a third clock named A' >>> which is definitely not a part of the synchronization procedure >>> that only involves TWO clocks. Worse now, tB' refer to a fourth >>> clocks. >>> >>> What the hell is happening in your mind, Richard? >>> >>> You are not even trying to make sense anymore. Anyway you've >>> already failed at that. >> >> But no, I did not fail. >> On the contrary, I told you, we will burn all the tanks, don't worry, >> and the relativistic data on the problem of Paul B. Andersen's >> synchronization will be written down. >> Don't worry, Jean-Pierre, don't worry. >> It's even worse than that, I will list not only the eight data, but all >> twelve, I will invent an additional event e3 which is the conjunction >> BB' in the problem. >> >> Let tA(e3), tA'(e3), tB(e3), tB'(e3). >> >> Don't worry Jean-Pierre, we will burn all your tanks, and the planes too. > > You are loosing your marbles Richard. On va tout brûler, ne t'inquiète pas. Et tes flèches aussi, on va les brûler. R.H.