Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [ARTICLE] Doctor Who title sequences ranked worst to best
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 04:55:53 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <2f475e7e75856e8b985f5b715e6f0ce3@www.novabbs.com>
References: <104somm$1vhog$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="234911"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="JQ+rN+8lHiaoPzx2oBkK9dG4T0EJbW72zXRcmrIzanI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 422c9e56918bc2bc0d1e75f5c0c3f3f557e11f2c
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$eHF0zv2YlZShcgRdyrC7geq5Q5LhO8EZF2cgcFsS9IiJdK3Xt60iS

best - fourth doctor = classic

worst - anything after 2005 = too loud and booming

-- 
https://www.theory11.com/