| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2f8ffef2faa60d42480e0671a6d146c7c89bf28a@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: May the numbers speak - supplement Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:45:15 +1000 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <2f8ffef2faa60d42480e0671a6d146c7c89bf28a@i2pn2.org> References: <20129e22c76a2b18b0a745e9499cbd9b@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$673c55b0$2ad8f129@7aad895b352201b7> <cc0a8c7a3216f3ed508bde73fc8bd422@www.novabbs.com> <feed5481a2c6f29340546fbefb23bb31@www.novabbs.com> <37a6f52a3ab1ec533fcf7ef30beb1022@www.novabbs.com> <nnd$673c55b0$2ad8f129@52950e570341256b> <7c15e1538a1604ad3c7a293ae6196da2530cd1a4@i2pn2.org> <87zfed2sbn.fsf@nightsong.com> <102fk3b$2ut8q$1@dont-email.me> <f0afd2a96800329381638d089d9e958287a596d0@i2pn2.org> <nnd$60801ebf$673609a7@27f3ceb479661625> <87bjqr359x.fsf@nightsong.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 02:45:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="412149"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="XPw7UV90Iy7EOhY4YuUXhpdoEf5Vz7K+BsxA/Cx8bVc"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <87bjqr359x.fsf@nightsong.com> On 14/06/2025 3:44 am, Paul Rubin wrote: > Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> writes: >> That's why I consider the use of global variables in library functions >> worse than locals. You're polluting the namespace. > > Obviously there are ways around that with wordlists, but it would be > nice if doing that was more convenient. You could have program sections > with their own encapsulated variables. Good point. As wordlists are expensive and complicated I leave them for situations equally demanding e.g. assembler. For libs (though not applications) I hide support words or data no longer needed with BEHEAD. To avoid their names potentially clashing with something during compile, I precede them with -? which disables redefinition warning for that item only.