Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<2frb1l-i61g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:57:08 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <2frb1l-i61g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:01:11 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7fc484e86b6f93d01746b9552d67795"; logging-data="2403634"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HfaiApKS5f7OFPceLXzJb" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tq3meDPm8WADDMslkwZ/v2hs3Po= Bytes: 1224 Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible. > > It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative. This is an absurd statement and everything about it is wrong, crackpot. <snip remaining nonsense unread>