Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<2jrmhj1v7lcchk04bcbj5eklp9ojo2f8jh@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The Joy Of Democracy Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:10:33 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <2jrmhj1v7lcchk04bcbj5eklp9ojo2f8jh@4ax.com> References: <fk1nej1493sbhtkt1gj05bjrplh8brdgol@4ax.com> <ll1m0vFqj06U1@mid.individual.net> <jthoejp43se49h1tlm1tfilg5l29evt4qs@4ax.com> <ll34utF2sr2U2@mid.individual.net> <lapoejdcdavfk9afj57ft0onn7st0se8dr@4ax.com> <ll39uoF3k5nU2@mid.individual.net> <m1toej53l5p8c417540flbg42vaqi1apjo@4ax.com> <vf6um5$15nlq$6@dont-email.me> <ClDRO.423798$FzW1.157455@fx14.iad> <vf7ki6$1ctc2$3@dont-email.me> <XtNRO.321348$v8v2.231389@fx18.iad> <vfa6b7$1u9vg$1@dont-email.me> <vffo8n$341q2$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:10:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="183e359049f87b83936f5af45b344efd"; logging-data="3298651"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RxCkl7dfIucTd3GmWRkSOMHcEVLdeAd0=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:urWpAsiT5moS5xodOPUZJVnO6Ok= OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 2856 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2024-10-23, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:09:09 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Considering who lives in places like Los Angeles and New York City, I >>> don't see why anyone would be willing to give them as much power as they >>> want. >> >> Why should the value of your vote depend on where you live? > >Because each state is sovereign and they entered into the Union with >specific guarantees. Constitutionally the Federal Government is supposed to >be limited to only a few powers, like defense of the country and a national >post office. The states are supposed to hold the bulk of the authority over >their citizens. It would be (and is in practice) tyranny when the Federal >government oversteps its limitations. Good, so Marco Rubio can fuck off when he talks about "federal law needs to be enforced" on cannabis. Oh, but he's a Republican! How interesting. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.