Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<2mk2jjp0dfghuiudn9eil63a7f1reko34g@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:44:18 +0000 From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: So How�s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing? Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:43:58 -0500 Message-ID: <2mk2jjp0dfghuiudn9eil63a7f1reko34g@4ax.com> References: <vgpjhs$8iev$2@dont-email.me> <kCSdndu98PilSq36nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vgr7n6$iihl$1@dont-email.me> <6r92jj9p9b00e603grskrf2lcq462fecjc@4ax.com> <vgrdri$jlck$1@dont-email.me> <q3f2jj9q2fojqrk5km2m0lrs4igsmfprnq@4ax.com> <vgrev4$jlck$7@dont-email.me> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 34 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-GcRgt7/ocSGXrB8SAINVvr7YBFp80O8w4wYJg2JYNNoEHBspbx+d6rWRdsdbRZkdwMJrS/vMZkmH6pp!tkuDi1ba1Q0udyBUjdp4NAcwXsilMqmI48Tsf3TQz/Bk1+sttnbjSM0wUkNbvJiMRgjYo5EM X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2484 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>> That *will* change. >>> >>>That’s what I mean by “spouting hot air”. >> >> You mean like an IntelAMD's fan? Heh. > >Look, we are agreed that x86 is a dead end. You seem to think that Windows >will somehow make the successful transition to some non-x86 architecture. >I am merely pointing out that it never has, and never will. I only care to the extent that Winblows sells hardware, I would delete Win11Copilot, if I bought one with it preinstalled, but there will be self-assembled ARM desktops before long, and Linux will be all the more immediately viable on them. But M$ is going to support it more and more, too, there's no reason it can't. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.