| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<2mv04khv63vlml2i6upkps6cdjbv5htocs@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:14:18 -0500 Organization: E. Nygma & Sons, LLC Lines: 39 Message-ID: <2mv04khv63vlml2i6upkps6cdjbv5htocs@4ax.com> References: <7stg3ktsmgruok4vhe9ano5he6itmjhkrv@4ax.com> <thug3kl02jlmnppqkcka8s7v4rk6scc8tt@4ax.com> <d397c25e65313b93d5124198ed81d23658f14cc0@i2pn2.org> <101br9k$d9mh$1@dont-email.me> <0b8ebed77c12b770bc4e71477d1594422dbf70ea@i2pn2.org> <101h4fh$1uq3b$1@dont-email.me> <oqho3k9ju5tilr34qsnolcajjorutsv2cj@4ax.com> <ptno3k59c56lfj0212c82oful6lspvopcv@4ax.com> <qbvo3kpki3p700vli5o5sonr435jjq6lfo@4ax.com> <101p036$naef$2@dont-email.me> <1n604ktr19vgrlfmbf9g75tc7im0r5p0ao@4ax.com> Reply-To: zaghadka@hotmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 19:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa6ba77d0dcd6b8fd2a93ed706d9b12f"; logging-data="1008810"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QYsKE8PMTLCZCg/rEOf+rgUxDWmV8Epc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:5HFUwb4s1zLH/gB0d3BY+eFgJTc= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:09:22 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, Xocyll wrote: >JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn >spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say: > >>On 01/06/2025 17:23, Xocyll wrote: >>>> (I'm pretty sure if it were up to my mother, she'd have had me watch >>>> TV from the other room. I wonder where the 'you'd go blind' rumor >>>> start anyway?) >>> Or been like my parents who bought into the whole "TV makes you stupid" >>> thing and allowed us 1 hour of TV ... a week. >>> >>> Star Trek on Saturday afternoon of course. >>> 2pm if I recall correctly, which I likely don't since it was 50+ years >>> ago. >> >>I've always found that a weird argument as it really depends on what you >>watch. I remember being fascinated watching Life on Earth with David >>Attenborough, that's was pretty educational for a ten year old. > >It was the 70s (barely) and TV was a wasteland of stupidity. > >>The strange thing is there isn't that same stigma about books even >>though there are lots of books which are complete trash. You get the >>same thing with watching 'too much' TV but being a bookworm is >>considered a positive. > >Books at least require you to be able to read, and stimulate the >imagination. > Apparently, you've never heard of "head canon." It's impossible *not* to stimulate some imaginations. -- Zag What's the point of growing up if you can't be childish sometimes? ...Terrance Dicks, BBC