Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<2mv04khv63vlml2i6upkps6cdjbv5htocs@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:14:18 -0500
Organization: E. Nygma & Sons, LLC
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <2mv04khv63vlml2i6upkps6cdjbv5htocs@4ax.com>
References: <7stg3ktsmgruok4vhe9ano5he6itmjhkrv@4ax.com> <thug3kl02jlmnppqkcka8s7v4rk6scc8tt@4ax.com> <d397c25e65313b93d5124198ed81d23658f14cc0@i2pn2.org> <101br9k$d9mh$1@dont-email.me> <0b8ebed77c12b770bc4e71477d1594422dbf70ea@i2pn2.org> <101h4fh$1uq3b$1@dont-email.me> <oqho3k9ju5tilr34qsnolcajjorutsv2cj@4ax.com> <ptno3k59c56lfj0212c82oful6lspvopcv@4ax.com> <qbvo3kpki3p700vli5o5sonr435jjq6lfo@4ax.com> <101p036$naef$2@dont-email.me> <1n604ktr19vgrlfmbf9g75tc7im0r5p0ao@4ax.com>
Reply-To: zaghadka@hotmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 19:14:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa6ba77d0dcd6b8fd2a93ed706d9b12f";
	logging-data="1008810"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QYsKE8PMTLCZCg/rEOf+rgUxDWmV8Epc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5HFUwb4s1zLH/gB0d3BY+eFgJTc=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846

On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:09:22 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote: 

>JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
>spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:
>
>>On 01/06/2025 17:23, Xocyll wrote:
>>>> (I'm pretty sure if it were up to my mother, she'd have had me watch
>>>> TV from the other room. I wonder where the 'you'd go blind' rumor
>>>> start anyway?)
>>> Or been like my parents who bought into the whole "TV makes you stupid"
>>> thing and allowed us 1 hour of TV ... a week.
>>> 
>>> Star Trek on Saturday afternoon of course.
>>> 2pm if I recall correctly, which I likely don't since it was 50+ years
>>> ago.
>>
>>I've always found that a weird argument as it really depends on what you 
>>watch. I remember being fascinated watching Life on Earth with David 
>>Attenborough, that's was pretty educational for a ten year old.
>
>It was the 70s (barely) and TV was a wasteland of stupidity.
>
>>The strange thing is there isn't that same stigma about books even 
>>though there are lots of books which are complete trash. You get the 
>>same thing with watching 'too much' TV but being a bookworm is 
>>considered a positive.
>
>Books at least require you to be able to read, and stimulate the
>imagination.
>
Apparently, you've never heard of "head canon." It's impossible *not* to
stimulate some imaginations.

-- 
Zag

What's the point of growing up 
if you can't be childish sometimes? ...Terrance Dicks, BBC