Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<2rookjduun8aj4rpokg4c952d8kr3rgrs4@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Roland <fake@ddress.no> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: OT: horrible 8086 segmentation Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 14:29:00 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <2rookjduun8aj4rpokg4c952d8kr3rgrs4@4ax.com> References: <vi2cdh$2t0i8$1@dont-email.me> <lqmf9uF4bggU1@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 14:28:47 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2a74436bc77ea32c72a4e2d6712a2b61"; logging-data="2658208"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/o/5mhfM62V5MJ2Iidn/QK" Cancel-Lock: sha1:qESe/5lezUicamEWJSByutLtMfo= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117 Bytes: 1407 On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:37:02 +0100, Josef Möllers <josef@invalid.invalid> wrote: >And to consider that, at that time, processors like MC68000 or NS32016 >were readily available. At the time when the design decision was made, the Motorola 68000 was not ready for production. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Personal_Computer : "The 68000 was considered the best choice,[19] but was not production-ready like the others." -- RoRo