Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for Trump deportees:
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:08:08 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <2ta84k5178gqcnqegg78j6ouvlpn2f50gn@4ax.com>
References: <atmo3khh39c4ourcmsomm5smij938e6ai2@4ax.com> <0m2v3k5kf2cbmbb8r8ll3nirr52lmvmnp5@4ax.com> <101o3gj$bbse$2@dont-email.me> <3h004kdpcjthllq8iplvuotaqhh0qunmgv@4ax.com> <10202sc$2javi$1@dont-email.me> <1020egi$2pd7f$2@dont-email.me> <10218qb$1fqj9$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 14:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1088effdeb3df91c3d18b89bd6afd954";
	logging-data="3190668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nTj6RiGTK/isqfE735iiduO3GdyKUT1M="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b8TEIBcSAKAiaxv2razaev08LZ0=

On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 07:46:18 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On 6/7/2025 12:17 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>> On 6/6/2025 7:58 PM, Beej Jorgensen wrote:
>>> In article <3h004kdpcjthllq8iplvuotaqhh0qunmgv@4ax.com>,
>>> Catrike Ryder  <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>> Mr Jorgensen seems to want each illegal to get a hearing. That's not a
>>>> workable solution.
>>>
>>> "Dear Founding Fathers,
>>>
>>> "This whole 'due process' thing just isn't practical. So we're just
>>> going to cut the judicial system out and let law enforcement decide who
>>> gets deported."
>>>
>> 
>> As noted here previously, US citizens have full civil and process 
>> rights. Legal resident aliens have some, but limited and green cards may 
>> be revoked. Temporary visa (of all types) holders may be removed "at the 
>> discretion of the Secretary of State".  Illegal aliens are subject to 
>> deportation when and where discovered.
>> 
>> In a practical sense, a finding of fact (who is this guy really?) is 
>> reasonable and prudent. That is not a trial.
>> 
>
>That's not the point. According to floriduh dumbass if you're accused of 
>being an illegal immigrant you shouldn't get due process, whether you're 
>really illegal or not.


Actually, as I explained, anyone who is officially accused of being an
illegal has a due process right to provide evidence to the accusing
official that he is not an illegal.

--
C'est bon
Soloman