Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<30tkrj99o1lik2ib4c4ju7eqlabtt3bu74@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!sewer!alphared!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: To sum up
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 18:06:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <30tkrj99o1lik2ib4c4ju7eqlabtt3bu74@4ax.com>
References: <vo1n39$2rdv4$1@dont-email.me> <vo47ib$3cm8h$1@dont-email.me> <vo7jg5$2090$1@dont-email.me> <vo7kt0$qvu$2@dont-email.me> <voovjr$3o3ri$1@dont-email.me> <vop70b$3sjqq$2@dont-email.me> <ndr0rj1m7bp2r4erpms6mcpquunmu4k9d0@4ax.com> <vov55a$13r1b$1@dont-email.me> <k8j8rj5t9n9b91c9q4qo25tiij5jbg7ti0@4ax.com> <vp1kc3$1kvce$1@dont-email.me> <upl8rjpg2luq1h0ch9bhv7sqelepba4t2e@4ax.com> <vp1o58$1lhpq$1@dont-email.me> <1k99rjdlu3nojs2r0525pq21j4qc3h9jb2@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="33497"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dd+tMRh54OeVDNHmUGHqu556VHw=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 7DA8A22978C; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:06:19 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C923229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:06:17 -0500 (EST)
	id 89C2C1C0B21; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8FF1C0125
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1153360627
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/1153360627; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buzz.off
	id 65895DC01CA; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 02:06:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 02:06:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+ffUOc7ADvAt4H41/Hteb0+2JRz0S/Fh8JIyZtwTkWKYJp17+7SBbP
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5701

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:29:58 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>:

>On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:41:42 +1100, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>:
>
>>On 18/02/2025 8:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:37:06 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 18/02/2025 8:15 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>>>>> The question I would like to see you address is how your Intelligent
>>>>> Designer might have gone about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> The human brain indeed has unique characteristics in terms of its
>>>>> ability and functions. Other species do not have those
>>>>> characteristics, but they do have similar brain structures and, as
>>>>> Ernest has pointed out in several examples, those brains can sometimes
>>>>> be argued to be even more complex than the human one. So how do you
>>>>> think your Intelligent Designer went about this? Did he play around
>>>>> with various prototype brain designs on other species and then come up
>>>>> with a particular design that he decided to give to humans alone?
>>>>
>>>> Why the hostile, mocking tone,
>>> 
>>> Not meant to be either hostile or mocking but I accept it may come
>>> across that way due to my frustration with you continually refusing to
>>> deal with issues raided by a fellow religious believer. [1]
>>> 
>>>> and straw man depiction of God?
>>> 
>>> It is you and your fellow IDers who have created a strawman by
>>> pretending to talk about some anodyne designer when you really mean
>>> God; and not just *any* God, the specific Christian God.
>>
>>I'm with many ID proponents who are openly Christians, but in the 
>>context of debating the interpretation and implications of scientific 
>>evidence, deliberately and correctly refer only to a non-specific 
>>intelligent designer interacting with this material world from outside 
>>of spacetime.
>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ===========================
>>> 
>>> [1] For example, still waiting for you to produce the evidence you
>>> promised 10 days ago about ID gaining traction.
>>> 
>Same here.
>>
>>It'll come, I'm still doing midnighters. And distracting myself with 
>>posts like these.
>>
>So, "The check is in the mail"?
>
>Either you know of such evidence or you were blowing smoke.
>If the former, a simple one-line cite to the evidence would
>have taken less time than the two sentences above. But I
>suspect it's actually the latter; simply the most recent in
>a long line of such from various ID apologists.
>>
4 days. OK; got it; you were blowing smoke. Thanks for
confirming.
>
-- 

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov