Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:48:40 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <316027c789a34e20a528f3620ae16e6917488022@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vrrpcl$11a56$4@dont-email.me>
	<8423998561d8feee807509b0ed6335123d35a7c9@i2pn2.org>
	<vrt3gv$264jb$4@dont-email.me>
	<448c82acff6b5fc1d2aa266be92df6f778ec2c6a@i2pn2.org>
	<vru5tp$38ob9$1@dont-email.me>
	<ac61f679d7ddb39b0ceaedd7f562899d36346535@i2pn2.org>
	<vrvccp$aq8m$3@dont-email.me>
	<e166831a8e02332d64ec151f61481e2629e6e53a@i2pn2.org>
	<vrvsh4$p4vd$2@dont-email.me>
	<c93030bbd81fb313c76c256c6e54beb48b07dfdd@i2pn2.org>
	<vs1vuv$2ot1m$1@dont-email.me>
	<d2f86fad6c5823e3c098f30d331576c52263b398@i2pn2.org>
	<vs2fgn$354gv$5@dont-email.me>
	<61f821b5a18046ab36ddb6c52a003b574cf34de6@i2pn2.org>
	<vs2hnm$38lvq$1@dont-email.me>
	<9be1ff2af6bbf405565b27bc8211adf9f353e9f2@i2pn2.org>
	<vs44b6$qjc3$1@dont-email.me>
	<3ff8345ef2ddb51594c67cf7f5cbb81f696afbc5@i2pn2.org>
	<vs4per$1c1ja$5@dont-email.me>
	<8a8d4ac681ff887744c6a24e9c8f2777222da16f@i2pn2.org>
	<vs4st9$1c1ja$10@dont-email.me>
	<5e189ff0084470a44513b48c8c9fd583d1797249@i2pn2.org>
	<vs6pbm$39556$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:48:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2228780"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3216
Lines: 29

Am Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:21:42 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/28/2025 5:23 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:10:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/27/2025 7:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/27/25 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/27/2025 4:56 PM, joes wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Yes, HHH is not a correct simulator.
>>>>> You say that it is not a correct simulator on the basis of your
>>>>> ignorance of the x86 language that conclusively proves that HHH does
>>>>> correctly simulate the first four instructions of DDD and correctly
>>>>> simulates itself simulating the first four instructions of DDD.
>> But only the first four - three actually, since the call doesn't
>> return.

^

>>>> It isn't a correct simulator,
>>> You know that you are lying about this or you would show how DDD
>>> emulated by HHH would reach its final state ACCORDING TO THE SEMANTICS
>>> OF THE X86 LANGUAGE.
>> Dude, it is impossible for HHH, that's why it's incorrect.
> Fully operational code conclusively proves that HHH emulated the first
> four instruction of DDD and then emulates itself emulating the first
> four instructions of DDD.
But not the return, as you agree. See above.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.