Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<34eefb019eb8455b619447f12e34e1b3@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:48:57 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <34eefb019eb8455b619447f12e34e1b3@www.novabbs.com>
References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <rQzdO.250256$RcM6.3626@fx13.ams4> <17db55a7e5709ab7$1933$480477$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <9283a49bcc091b1f621ebd566d650a38@www.novabbs.com> <fridnXzRMeebPOr7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <6677e170$0$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <GgOdnRiQkYyT3ef7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ldv7jcFpoddU9@mid.individual.net> <hRycnWu7NvCFvub7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <667bc249$0$11713$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <fLmcnSyR2vOM7OH7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <6686f816$0$3283$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <v68col$3fag8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2b08dc378555ea532b8bb69fb2f3b360@www.novabbs.com> <les1i7F7uhdU3@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2348228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="PtTzNZ/rAwgDizggAN6nFyXf9uwNnFyhqni5h3z0+nk";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 1e9a9b00c4df1d2a0ee220eb771978720eb1e6a3
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$MYEz3.XtsLftUDrbe3eo8eQi08rDfFc8fWoRu6dxrjI7UBFCX5w2S
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3067
Lines: 46

Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor:
>> Conservation of charge is the only conservation law.
>> Rest is bollocks.
>
>
> I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'.

Charge exist without observers. All matter save aether is electrons and
protons.
>
> Actually  I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon
> are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom,
> while the photon flies away in a streight line.

Wrong. Photon is a brief em pulse.
>
> The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy:

It has to do with the dimensions of the atom sized radiating antenna
causing the aetheric vibration.
>
> in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet).

Every photon is a brief em pulse.
>
> If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is
> 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron.
>
> A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain aspect
> of a standing 'rotation wave'.
>
> The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point
> 'proton'.
>
> If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon.
>
> And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron.
>
> Therefore: charge is not conserved.

As per your conjecture and assumptions which have no physical basis but
worthy of the great physics hoaxes of our time.
>
>
> TH