Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<34eefb019eb8455b619447f12e34e1b3@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor @novabbs.com (bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:48:57 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <34eefb019eb8455b619447f12e34e1b3@www.novabbs.com> References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <rQzdO.250256$RcM6.3626@fx13.ams4> <17db55a7e5709ab7$1933$480477$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <9283a49bcc091b1f621ebd566d650a38@www.novabbs.com> <fridnXzRMeebPOr7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <6677e170$0$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <GgOdnRiQkYyT3ef7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ldv7jcFpoddU9@mid.individual.net> <hRycnWu7NvCFvub7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <667bc249$0$11713$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <fLmcnSyR2vOM7OH7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <6686f816$0$3283$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <v68col$3fag8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <2b08dc378555ea532b8bb69fb2f3b360@www.novabbs.com> <les1i7F7uhdU3@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2348228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="PtTzNZ/rAwgDizggAN6nFyXf9uwNnFyhqni5h3z0+nk"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 1e9a9b00c4df1d2a0ee220eb771978720eb1e6a3 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$MYEz3.XtsLftUDrbe3eo8eQi08rDfFc8fWoRu6dxrjI7UBFCX5w2S X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 3067 Lines: 46 Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor: >> Conservation of charge is the only conservation law. >> Rest is bollocks. > > > I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'. Charge exist without observers. All matter save aether is electrons and protons. > > Actually I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon > are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom, > while the photon flies away in a streight line. Wrong. Photon is a brief em pulse. > > The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy: It has to do with the dimensions of the atom sized radiating antenna causing the aetheric vibration. > > in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet). Every photon is a brief em pulse. > > If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is > 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron. > > A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain aspect > of a standing 'rotation wave'. > > The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point > 'proton'. > > If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon. > > And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron. > > Therefore: charge is not conserved. As per your conjecture and assumptions which have no physical basis but worthy of the great physics hoaxes of our time. > > > TH