Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:40:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <34q2mk-tnok1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <cel9lk-q9sg.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>   <leim3oFq4asU1@mid.individual.net> <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <e33f14d8977190b22c067ce4ca07175e@www.novabbs.com> <pr4glk-gsip.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> <v6k04b$1g2g6$1@dont-email.me> <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <v6k82e$1hcdb$1@dont-email.me> <kpo0mk-cooh1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <v6mcos$1vobu$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:46:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d175af432983231444cc080c7ce3e9a9";
	logging-data="2101848"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cGgkMR5iHUyVG0/LLUEAn"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2+G698ISKVbxEDLqrDkHbJI4uak=
Bytes: 2515

David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On 7/9/24 18:05, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>> On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>> David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>>>> On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
>>>>>> operator and an extra letter.
>>>>>> Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
>>>>> formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc
>>>>
>>>> This is Arindam.
>>>
>>> It isn't always necessary to say so.
>> 
>> True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
>> don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.
> 
> If replacing c^2 with cc in Einstein's formula is Arindam's way of
> expressing disdain for Einstein's formula, what are we to make of
> the fact that Arindam's formula, e=0.5mVVN(N-k), contains VV instead
> of V^2?  Is he disdaining his own formula?

Nope, just demonstrating his lack of knowledge of mathematical notation
and his childish habit of mangling things to show everyone how clever he
thinks he is.