Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<3570d58cf5fea3a0a8ac8724b653d1596447d0d1@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: What I told ChatGPT is essentially identical to the first page of
 my paper
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:39:38 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <3570d58cf5fea3a0a8ac8724b653d1596447d0d1@i2pn2.org>
References: <vf3eu5$fbb3$2@dont-email.me>
	<6fa1774ec1e4b13035be3eab85555b609b301d69@i2pn2.org>
	<vf3os0$hqgf$1@dont-email.me>
	<de0c3b304ab574b45594ec05085c193fd687f9f7@i2pn2.org>
	<vf40l9$ja0c$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:39:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2999698"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2303
Lines: 26

Am Sun, 20 Oct 2024 17:36:25 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 10/20/2024 4:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/20/24 4:23 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2024 2:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/24 1:33 PM, olcott wrote:

>> Note, I DID tell that to Chat GPT, and it agrees that DDD, when the
>> criteria is what does DDD actually do, which is what the question MUST
>> be about to be about the Termination or Halting problem, then DDD WILL
>> HALT since HHH(DDD) will return 0 to it.
> No one ever bother to notice that (a) A decider cannot have its actual
> self as its input.
lolwut? A decider is a normal program, and it should be handled like every
other input.

> (b) In the case of the pathological input DDD to emulating termination
> analyzer HHH the behavior of the directly executed DDD (not an input to
> HHH) is different than the behavior of DDD that is an input to HHH.
DDD *is* the input to HHH.

> The executed DDD calls HHH() and this call returns. The emulated DDD
> calls HHH(DDD) and this call cannot possibly return.
But whyyy doesn't HHH abort?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.