Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:42:16 +0000 Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:42:16 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 42 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-1TQf9c60Hx865cxunzr7QwqNjdO6ZO7GxtMWynT8y/Uzko0Hz9rjuOZLPci/E/a2RiJaEqlPjkpZx0F!nEXkQtOqwQF3OC8oH8/iEgoleyyhr6Fwtm/fAR6JHyM2Sk9yCg518YZ+UHv0/mu/wol8k01FpYfx!MjMl+eDsbVF71at1l/AX X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3158 On 9/24/24 8:26 AM, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 23/09/2024 23:45, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> Hey, want "Real Computing" ? Try FORTRAN >> or COBOL. THOSE were the foundation and >> persist to this day. Wrote a FORTRAN app >> just a couple of years ago - mostly to vex >> the New Guys. Also a short COBOL app, that >> oughtta REALLY give 'em the shits ! :-) > > Back in 1985, I changed jobs from a University computer center, where we > did our technical documentation using Univac's @DOC processor, to a > small industrial computer system integration firm, where we built > real-time systems on RSX-11M. I missed the @DOC so much that I wrote a > re-implementation in FORTRAN IV. Used it for years afterwards, until I > landed at a larger house doing communications work on Unix, and switched > to /troff/. Hey, FORTRAN *will* Get It Done as neatly as most anything else. If you need many decades worth of exotic math libs, you'll find them in FORTRAN too. It is NOT an obsolete language/approach. For the younger people, note that Python carries over a lot of FORTRAN ideas, including easy string-slicing. If you can do BASIC then you can do FORTRAN, but does anybody use BASIC anymore ? Intel/IBM did sell BASCOM ... a BASIC compiler ... and it DID speed up yer code like by 10X :-) COBOL ... well ... would rather NOT use it. The whole "self documenting" idea turned out to be crap - COBOL is *hard* to understand sometimes. That's why COBOL programmers can get really high-pay jobs these days, because so much of that irreplacable biz software from the 60s was writ in COBOL. Nobody can AFFORD to re-write it. It worked, it works, it was writ by REALLY GOOD narrow-tie Dilberts, so you just have to MAINTAIN it like forever.