Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<374727212.749237737.475439.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:54:39 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <374727212.749237737.475439.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> <36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me> <iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 19:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="20ef474fa749b5cdf37421ef054a9b68"; logging-data="1433240"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jPI8b2A7MvJMXdDOfSIjv" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PfLEVmzODlkyAoN9yoUM5B1VHp0= sha1:F0teKEUNg6c21U10G0cHi37LAOo= Bytes: 2096 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: > On 2024-09-27, geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 9/27/24 13:43, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2024-09-27, geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Cobol was also very portable. >>> >>> As long as your destination compiler supports COMP-3. :-) >> >> Or your source computer didn't have COMP-3, or if you didn't use it. > > I was once called in to optimize a CPU-bound COBOL program. > The genius who wrote it declared all subscripts as COMP-3. > Changing them to COMP-4 knocked 30% off the execution time. > BTDT. That’s why I always believed all programmers should have some knowledge of the underlying machine architecture. -- Pete