Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.network!news.neodome.net!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:13:15 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <377cc37c50c085564fa23d782ee5abed@www.novabbs.org>
References: <edf10d817223ffd88b82f1e254d64959@www.novabbs.org> <1049af1$102pu$1@tor.dont-email.me> <eff53e0b9f87998bd6bad9531ca87b90@www.novabbs.org> <nj0mjl-c4fe.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <d6783236c077297576e7f3af748d7019@www.novabbs.org> <j1tdkl-s53i1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f33854fd0ba9ed49b28abf759e08e336@www.novabbs.org> <d35ekl-dkgi1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="596306"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$ntg6ds6OOW.31p.LfXPuPO8Fgs3/T0k3Q9MOqTa2icawNc2FYPVkK
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 2:02:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 23:45:25 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 22:19:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip old stuff>
>>>
>>>>>         Arindam dismisses cloud chamber evidence —
>>>>
>>>> It has nothing to do with Nature. Just an artificial construct at best.
>>>> So yes, that evidence is irrelevant. Nothing as relevant as Arindam's
>>>> rail gun experiments showing inertia violation.
>>>
>>> You mean your low speed pipe roller that you are so proud of that you
>>> have never written it up as text Arindam?
>>
>> Arindam has done much better than that. He had provided crystal clear
>> video evidence with full explanations. That is a new way of providing
>> scientific truth. It is understandable to everyone. Schoolchildren in
>> particular with uncorrupted minds.
>
> Youtube videos of your feet do not constitute documentation Arindam.
>
>>
>> As it is incontrovertible it has to be ignored or demeaned by the vested
>> interests.
>>
>> WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>>
>>> Unlike your low speed pipe roller, it has been trivial to find detailed
>>> instructions on how to build one since it's invention in 1911.
>>
>> Can one make it for $1000 which is the equipment cost of Arindam's
>> apparatus? Can one make it work in one's garage or living room?
>
> Yes and if you payed $1,000 for that pipe roller you got ripped off big
> time Arindam.

The super capacitors cost hundreds and then there are chargers, cameras,
rollers, copper, wood, fasteners, power supply for charging,
multimeters, workshop equipment, brass cylinder, computers for
analysis...

You have no clue of even the most elementary costing. Your attempts to
pull down Arindam's work show desperation.
>
> Scientific American in The Amateur Scientist column of April 1956
> published the plans for a DIY cloud chamber.
>
> Most of the parts were junkyard bits and pieces and cost next to nothing
> to procure even in 1956 dollars Arindam.

Who cares for ancient history. How much does a hamburger cost these
days! Anyway you need to spend thousands to know where to get abandoned
equipment which may not work. Try to make them from scratch as Arindam
did using by buying commercial products with his own money and then
talk.
>
> They also published articles in that time frame on how to build DIY
> particle accelerators, xray machines, finishing vacuum pumps and many
> other pieces of real scientific equipment.
>
> CERN published a manual for a DIY cloud chamber in 2016 that would cost
> well under $100 to build.
>
> https://indico.cern.ch/event/508578/contributions/2327916/attachments/1367925/2073120/SCoolLAB_CloudChamber_DIYManual_2016_v2.pdf
>
> There are LOTS of plans out there for DIY cloud chambers that would cost
> well under $100 to build.
>
> There is a kit to build a cloud chamber on ebay for $29.99.
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/115162907606?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&mkscid=101&itemid=115162907606&targetid=2295557531950&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=1014089&poi=&campaignid=21400677539&mkgroupid=173029508628&rlsatarget=pla-2295557531950&abcId=9448483&merchantid=6296724&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21400677539&gclid=Cj0KCQjwss3DBhC3ARIsALdgYxOrerHJCaWCpLRPd-BnZ0VOT-Xngc1doWJ2hhrglluLyRP0OtTzmKwaAigREALw_wcB
>
> You can buy one fully built on Amazon for $387.73.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Arbor-Scientific-Ionizing-Radiation-Specially/dp/B0DY23HNMH/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2N09Y99X6CPEH&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.XB2Vsz00dEbn62QueM_CnnDdTZwUMPHfdSx0xOHKNiE.eSv-1U8f9MomInZE71KTSf2p2lcmSa_1NpzEByOW9uQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=cloud+chamber&qid=1752458169&s=toys-and-games&sprefix=cloud+chamber%2Ctoys-and-games%2C207&sr=1-3

--