Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: film.art@gmail.com (JanPB)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:10:46 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <3816ef2676ce1aa6a8c37d69bc10aa33@www.novabbs.com>
References: <t5AySA2aWT46Ra7AsAZqm8Hc3GM@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1019104"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jbf9ODw05erRG5e/iTB5O4FuOiiR328AFAd4frgdrX4";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 41df9b4c39cd8dd5aa85a9827acb9c5529cd7dea
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$IOU3WCbr2T2U67nrUCQ7oeeOPYXpuLg8oBGi2UQMZL.QoN/BNhJVO
Bytes: 1907
Lines: 33

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:52:42 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> One of the most fundamental problems in the history of humanity and the
> very basis of the notion of relativity of simultaneity: how to
> synchronize
> two watches so that they give the same time at the same present moment?
>
> A little explanation would have been welcome.
>
> Of course, in a Newtonian universe, it is not difficult.
>
> But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own
> hyperplane
> of present time?
>
> A slightly blurred line in Poincaré.
>
> Five lines in Einstein who thereby succeeds in the feat of evading the
> anisochronous question.
>
> Nothing in Jean-Pierre Messager (the great critic of modern science).
>
> One would think one was dreaming.
>
> R.H.

Pick a different hobby. This is simply not your thing,
you keep forever spinning wheels, same thing over and over which
is not even wrong. Just gobbledygook.

Don't waste your life on this.

--
Jan