Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious =?UTF-8?B?QmF1Ymxlcz8=?=
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:26:47 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <39596b92c115bb8b817caaf7e89aee94@www.novabbs.com>
References: <266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com> <679284FD.3ABB@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="826994"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$2lE9kQ2QUnkdUsbRuIfkE.H2bMIYN8Hp0.wEQoQmxgl4cmKJQeANC
Bytes: 2443
Lines: 34

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>
>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles.
>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain
>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The
>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a
>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing
>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as
>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and thoughtlessly
>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic,
>> slavish, and avoidable.
>
>
> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks
> monopoly'.
>
> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers)
>
> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel.
>
>
> The cabal decides what they want you to think.
>
>
> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal.
>
>
>
There is a double standard when claims of having proved parallel lines
do not meet are regarded as ridiculous, while implicitly assuming they
do is viewed as brilliant. This proves that some absurdly stupid ideas
have been marketed so slickly as to put them over on almost everybody to
the profit of universities and big science.