Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:06:05 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <39917bac9e5356a7f212d1f96c98c29e6cb0b140@i2pn2.org>
References: <vegfro$lk27$9@dont-email.me> <veimqs$14que$1@dont-email.me>
 <veipf3$15764$1@dont-email.me>
 <36ecdefcca730806c7bd9ec03e326fac1a9c8464@i2pn2.org>
 <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me> <vel9ct$1l118$1@dont-email.me>
 <velorl$1n3gb$5@dont-email.me> <veopa8$2ameu$1@dont-email.me>
 <veoq8a$29dtl$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:06:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2363984"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <veoq8a$29dtl$5@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3426
Lines: 59

On 10/16/24 12:39 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/16/2024 11:23 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-10-15 12:57:25 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 10/15/2024 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-14 15:18:43 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>> On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the
>>>>>>>>> premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and 
>>>>>>>>> HHH.
>>>>>>>>> *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No reasoning shown.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>>>>>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be 
>>>>>>> wrong when
>>>>>>> it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it
>>>>>>> will explain your mistake to you.
>>>>>> It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said
>>>>> to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to
>>>>> look at it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You never confirmed that you even know what infinite
>>>>> recursion is.
>>>>
>>>> Could you confirm that you know whether there is an infinite recursion
>>>> in DDD?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Recursive emulation is isomorphic to recursion.
>>>
>>> The following is to be understood only within my
>>> stipulative definitions of terms provided in my first
>>> reply to you today.
>>>
>>> Recursive emulation that does not have a termination
>>> condition within the c function under test is infinite.
>>>
>>> This refers to my stipulative definition of terms
>>> provided in my first reply to you. To the best of my
>>> knowledge these definitions are also industry standard.
>>
>> This can be interpreted as an overly verbose 'No'.
>>
> 
> I will equally say that you are wrong.
> 

WHich just proves that you know you have no correct basis for your 
claims and know you are just a pathological liar.