Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<3ae5bc0c74b02659fea50bb1b6e41ff14000e38f@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:12:16 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <3ae5bc0c74b02659fea50bb1b6e41ff14000e38f@i2pn2.org> References: <vb0lkb$1c1kh$2@dont-email.me> <vb1hdi$1feme$1@dont-email.me> <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:12:17 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="602294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <vb4erg$2s0uc$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1731 Lines: 23 On 9/2/24 9:33 AM, olcott wrote: > On 9/1/2024 5:58 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-09-01 03:04:43 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> *I just fixed the loophole of the Gettier cases* >>> >>> knowledge is a justified true belief such that the >>> justification is sufficient reason to accept the >>> truth of the belief. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem >> >> The remaining loophole is the lack of an exact definition >> of "sufficient reason". >> > > Ultimately sufficient reason is correct semantic > entailment from verified facts. > > But not possible to KNOW you have reached that point. Sorry, you are just to stupid to understand the problem, and are thus a perfect example of the problem itself.