Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:25:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <3aed9291dd746be1c3d8760a16b0f5ddb279313f@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me> <v5su4q$1kfbr$11@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sv8o$ogo5$1@dont-email.me> <v5t0h8$1kfbr$12@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t1af$omq9$1@dont-email.me> <v5t3h4$1kfbr$13@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t470$t0hj$1@dont-email.me> <v5u2o5$1mj7k$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5u8li$12udb$3@dont-email.me> <v5vi5p$1oanb$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5vlb2$1b0k9$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:25:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2014902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3016
Lines: 35

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 20:32:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:

> On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/1/24 8:49 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/30/24 10:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/30/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/30/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/30/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/30/24 9:03 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/30/2024 7:44 PM,
>>>>>>>> Richard Damon wrote:

>>>>>> And, since the HHH that DDD calls will abort is emulation, it WILL
>>>>>> return to DDD and it will return also.
>>>>>>
>>>>> How can stopping the emulation the first four instructions of DDD
>>>>> possibly do anything besides stop?
>>>>>
>>>> The emulation stops, and the emulating behavor of HHH stops, but not
>>>> the behavior of the input.
>>>
>>> When DDD is no longer being emulated all of its behavior stops. DDD is
>>> the input.
>>>
>> Nope, the emulation of DDD may stop, but the BEHAIVOR of THE INPUT,
>> which isn't dependent on the emulator looking at it,
> 
> That is a stupid lie. In input is a static string when not emulated and
> only becomes a dynamic process when emulated.
Defined that way, there is no notion of the input halting or not AT ALL.
If you abort, you are not simulating the input, because it doesn’t contain
an abort.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.