Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Spacetime
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:03:08 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <3d05da1bc3e7044abccacfc8ea78eed4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <le0krbF2j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <816c22cd6777f919d255d5b5a98551e6@www.novabbs.com> <le4hgmFk1orU5@mid.individual.net> <aa1b8ce99f8dc2406be92550817af4d7@www.novabbs.com> <lecehcFr3voU9@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1689899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$gb.aByZX5LeXgCZaw9FPqODPqCxKBqQxjQYf4ls7fSJkYCVZ5gW9S
Bytes: 2926
Lines: 65

Thomas Heger wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag000027, 27.06.2024 um 20:32 schrieb gharnagel:
> >
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >
> > > My own approach is very different and based on spacetime of GR as
> > > 'real'.
> > >
> > > Now I only needed VERY few assumption!
> > >
> > > that are mainly: points have features and space is a subset of
> something
> > > with higher dimensions.
> >
> > Ah, sounds like M-theory :-))
>
> No, I dislike stringtheory and had no extension of that theory in mind.

But M-theory STILL fits that description.  Just because you don't like
it
doesn't mean it's false.

> I wanted something different than one of the usual 'materialistic'
> concepts, to which string-theory actually belongs.

That's where ALL of physics IS.

> I wanted to create matter, space and time out of pure nothing.

That seems to describe a god complex.

> There exist actually a book about this idea.

There are books about ANY idea.

> Unfortunaterly it is very expensive and VERY difficult to read.
>
> (My own 'book'  is for free and much easier to read.)

I read as much as I could stand.

> > > Also: systems are what you call system and have imaginary borders,
> which
> > > are infinetely thin.
> >
> > "Infinitely thin" means nonexistent.
>
> Sure.
>
> That's why I wrote, that spacetime of GR is a smooth continuum.

But the real world is not a smooth continuum.

> What we regard as systems, that are actually subparts, which we define
> as independent systems, while these borders between them depend on our
> definitions.
>
> But actually there are no independent entities, because the entities we
> call 'particles' are not as independent as we think.
>
> TH

Maybe, maybe not.  Have you seen Mindwalk?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindwalk